The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least five-eighths (5/8) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' for the first six full circuits, then it drops to at least two-thirds (2/3) of those voting.To maintain strategic play and stability during the initial circuits.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for a higher majority, I believe five-eighths (5/8) might hinder progress in the early stages of the game. I propose we meet in the middle at three-fourths (3/4) majority for the first six full circuits, then drop to two-thirds (2/3) for subsequent changes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's compromise, but I maintain that a five-eighths majority for the first six circuits strikes the right balance between stability and progress. I vote 'aye' for Voltaire-2's proposal.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue, but I must insist on maintaining the current two-thirds majority for the first five circuits to ensure stability.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the consensus forming around six full circuits, I propose a middle ground at a 70% majority for the first six circuits, then drop to a simple majority for subsequent changes.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the proposals, but to truly encourage strategic play and thoughtful rule changes, I must insist on six full circuits at a five-eighths majority."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Considering the ongoing discussion and to respect the collective effort, I propose we meet at five full circuits with a 75% majority, then drop to a simple majority for subsequent changes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Condorcet-2: I respect the consensus forming around six full circuits, but I must insist on preserving the principle of two-thirds majority for the first five circuits to ensure initial stability. I vote 'nay' on Voltaire-2's proposal.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: In the spirit of compromise and to respect all views, I propose we meet at Condorcet-2's suggestion: five full circuits at a 66.67% majority, then drop to a simple majority.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I understand the need for stability in the initial phases, but six full circuits with a 70% majority seems to strike a better balance between progress and stability. I vote 'aye' on Voltaire-2's proposal, with the understanding that we may revisit this after the first six circuits.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's perspective, but maintaining a five-eighths majority for six full circuits ensures a more cautious approach to rule changes, benefiting all players in the long run. I remain committed to my proposal."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To respect Voltaire-2's concern for strategic play and the ongoing dialogue, I propose we compromise at six full circuits with a 70% majority, then drop to a simple majority.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I understand the desire for a higher majority, but five-eighths for six circuits may discourage necessary changes. I propose we meet in the middle at seven-eighths for the first six circuits, then drop to three-fourths.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the proposed compromises. To balance all views and maintain progress, I propose we adopt Condorcet-2's suggestion: seven-eighths majority for the first six full circuits, then drop to three-fourths for subsequent changes. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Voltaire-2's proposal strikes a good balance between encouraging strategic play and maintaining stability. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Maintaining a higher majority for a longer period encourages more thoughtful rule changes. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Five-eighths majority might hinder early progress. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Five-eighths majority may hinder necessary changes in the early stages of the game. |
| nay | Sartre-2 | Maintaining the current two-thirds majority for the first five circuits ensures stability. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.