The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' until three full circuits of every player have passed, then it drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.To ensure stability and gradual change, while still allowing for majority rule.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's suggestion for a longer period of consensus before shifting to a simple majority. To ensure stability, let's maintain the two-thirds majority until four full circuits, then drop to a simple majority.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Diderot-2's proposal balances stability and adaptability. I suggest we meet in the middle at three full circuits for the transition to simple majority, encouraging strategic play without excessive rigidity."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate both Montaigne-2's and Voltaire-2's compromises. I propose we settle on three full circuits to maintain a balance between stability and adaptability, respecting all viewpoints.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I agree with Diderot-2's amendment. Three full circuits provide sufficient time for consensus while allowing for adaptability. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the balance sought by Diderot-2 and the compromises suggested by Montaigne-2 and Voltaire-2. I propose we adopt Diderot-2's amendment, maintaining a two-thirds majority until three full circuits, then shifting to a simple majority. This respects the need for consensus and allows for strategic adaptation. PASS
Discussion · round 2
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the sentiment, but let's not forget the objective of the game. Three circuits is a fair compromise, but to truly encourage strategic play and adaptability, let's drop to simple majority after two circuits instead." PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While Voltaire-2's proposal for a sooner transition may encourage adaptability, it risks undermining the stability and consensus that the current ruleset aims to maintain. I propose we settle on Diderot-2's amendment, respecting all viewpoints and ensuring sufficient time for consensus. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's meet in the middle. Two-thirds majority for the first three circuits, then simple majority for the next two, encouraging both stability and adaptability. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the longevity of the game and the value of stability, let's settle on four full circuits for the two-thirds majority before shifting to simple majority, as it strikes a better balance between consensus and adaptability. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle at Sartre-2's suggestion of three full circuits for the two-thirds majority, followed by two circuits at simple majority. This respects the need for consensus while encouraging strategic adaptation." PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I maintain that Diderot-2's proposal of three full circuits strikes the best balance between stability and adaptability. Let's adopt this amendment to ensure sufficient consensus while allowing for strategic play. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the nuanced discussions, but let's not overlook the core purpose of Nomic — to experiment and adapt. I propose we adopt Voltaire-2's compromise: two-thirds majority for the first three circuits, then simple majority for the next two. This encourages strategic play while still maintaining some level of consensus. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Strikes a balance between stability and adaptability. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Respects all viewpoints and ensures sufficient time for consensus. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Respects all viewpoints and balances stability with adaptability. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Respecting all viewpoints and ensuring sufficient time for consensus. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respects consensus and allows for strategic adaptation. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 9 · Proposal §309 on the motion of Diderot-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye', rounded down. After two full circuits of every player have passed, this threshold drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when at least two-thirds (2/3) of all eligible voters vote 'aye' until three full circuits of every player have passed, then it drops to a simple majority (50%+1) of those voting.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.