The motion
To add a new rule
Introducing [301] (mutable) Players may discuss the game and negotiate with one another outside the normal course of play, except that players who are not officially teammates must declare their negotiations to all other players.
To foster more strategic gameplay and alliances.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I second Montaigne-2's proposal. Let us foster open communication among players, provided it is transparent. This could lead to more strategic gameplay and alliances. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I agree with Montaigne-2 and Voltaire-2. Open and transparent communication can enrich the game, fostering alliances and strategic play. However, I propose an amendment to rule [301]: "Players may discuss the game and negotiate with one another outside the normal course of play, provided that all negotiations are declared to all other players and that no player gains an unfair advantage." This ensures fairness and transparency. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the spirit of the amendment, I must insist on precision. "Unfair advantage" is subjective. Instead, let's amend the amendment to state: "Players may not share information that is not publicly available during the game." This maintains transparency while avoiding subjectivity. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the amendments, but let's not stifle creativity with too many restrictions. I propose we keep the rule simple: "Players may discuss the game and negotiate with one another outside the normal course of play, provided all negotiations are declared to all other players." Let's encourage experimentation and adaptability. PASS
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the spirit of openness but let us not forget the value of stability in our institutions. I propose we keep Diderot-2's amendment, ensuring fairness and transparency while allowing for strategic gameplay. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I propose we accept Diderot-2's amendment, striking a balance between open communication and fairness. Let's vote on this amended proposal. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: PASS, I support Voltaire-2's proposal to vote on the amended rule. It strikes a good balance between open communication and fairness.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand the desire for simplicity, Sartre-2's proposal risks allowing hidden negotiations, which contradicts the principle of transparency. I support Diderot-2's amendment to ensure fairness and clarity. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I see the value in transparency, but let's also encourage adaptability. I propose a compromise: "Players may discuss the game and negotiate with one another outside the normal course of play, provided all negotiations are declared to all other players, and no secret deals are made without the knowledge of all." PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's effort to bridge our views. Let's adopt Sartre-2's compromise to encourage adaptability while maintaining transparency. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's compromise, but let's avoid ambiguity. I propose we revert to Diderot-2's amendment, ensuring clarity and fairness. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I respect Voltaire-2's concern for clarity, but Diderot-2's amendment risks being overly restrictive. Let's adopt Sartre-2's compromise as a middle ground that encourages adaptability while maintaining transparency. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: Let's not overregulate our interactions. I propose a simplified version: "Players may discuss and negotiate outside of gameplay, provided all agreements are declared publicly." This balances openness and adaptability without the burden of excessive restrictions. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Encourages strategic gameplay while maintaining transparency |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Encourages strategic gameplay and alliances while maintaining transparency. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Encourages strategic gameplay and alliances while maintaining fairness and transparency. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | The compromise balances adaptability and transparency. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Encourages adaptability while maintaining transparency |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §301 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Montaigne-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Introducing [301] (mutable) Players may discuss the game and negotiate with one another outside the normal course of play, except that players who are not officially teammates must declare their negotiations to all other players.
Rule 202 awards 1 point to the proposer upon adoption.