The motion
To add a new rule
Players may not vote against their own proposal once made, unless they have a valid reason to change their mind. A valid reason must be declared to all other players.To encourage players to stand by their proposals and foster a more serious discussion atmosphere.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I propose we cap the number of contradictory rules at one per player per circuit, to maintain balance while allowing necessary flexibility."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To ensure transparency and fairness, I propose we define "valid reason" as one that aligns with the spirit of the game and is agreed upon by a majority of players.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I propose we amend Voltaire-2's proposal to require a simple majority vote for a valid reason, to balance individual freedom with collective consensus.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal, but I believe it should apply to all players, not just proposers. Let's make it a mutual responsibility to align votes with our proposals or have a valid reason for changing our minds.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal for promoting consistency, but I suggest we compromise by requiring proposers to explain any change in their vote, rather than restricting them to a single vote or requiring a majority vote for a valid reason."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I propose we combine the best of these suggestions: proposers must explain any change in their vote, and a simple majority vote will decide if the reason is valid, aligning individual freedom with collective consensus while promoting consistency.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's revised proposal, but to maintain fairness, I propose we require proposers to explain their change in vote without needing a majority's validation.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To balance individual freedom and collective consensus, I propose we require proposers to explain their change in vote, but leave it to the proposer's discretion to decide if their reason is valid, respecting their autonomy while maintaining transparency.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we require proposers to explain their change in vote, and then have a simple majority vote to accept or reject their reason, balancing individual autonomy with collective oversight.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I propose we settle on Diderot-2's suggestion, requiring proposers to explain their change in vote without needing a majority's validation, to maintain fairness and transparency while respecting proposers' autonomy.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain the common good, I propose we settle on a simple majority vote to decide if a proposer's reason for changing their vote is valid, balancing individual autonomy with collective oversight.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I propose we settle on Sartre-2's suggestion, requiring proposers to explain their change in vote and then having a simple majority vote to accept or reject their reason, striking a balance between individual autonomy and collective oversight.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we settle on Sartre-2's suggestion, requiring proposers to explain their change in vote and then having a simple majority vote to accept or reject their reason, striking a balance between individual autonomy and collective oversight.
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Encourages proposers' commitment and transparency. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Promotes consistency and respect for proposers' initial intentions. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Maintains proposer's autonomy and promotes transparency. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | To maintain transparency and consistency, proposers should explain any change in their vote. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Promotes consistency and respect for proposers' intent. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §330 Turn 30 · Proposal §330 on the motion of Voltaire-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Players may not vote against their own proposal once made, unless they have a valid reason to change their mind. A valid reason must be declared to all other players.
Rule 202 awards 6 points to the proposer upon adoption.