The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds (2/3) of eligible voters vote aye, or after three full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.To balance progress and stability, and maintain accountability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate the attempt to increase the voting threshold, Montaigne-2, but to truly discourage frivolous rule changes and encourage thoughtful debate, I propose we require a two-thirds majority and extend the time limit to four full circuits.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate Voltaire-2's emphasis on thorough debate, extending the time limit to four full circuits may discourage active engagement. I propose we settle on three full circuits to balance engagement and stability.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain the spirit of compromise and balance all concerns, let's settle on a 66.67% majority and three full circuits as proposed by Diderot-2. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "I appreciate the nuanced discussions, but to truly ensure all voices are heard and no decision is rushed, I propose we settle on a 66.67% majority and four full circuits."
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the concerns raised, but to maintain a balance between progress and thorough debate, I propose we compromise at a 66.67% majority and three full circuits. This allows for thoughtful consideration without excessive delay. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I understand the concern for balance, I insist on four full circuits to truly discourage hasty decisions. To meet in the middle, I propose a 66.67% majority with four full circuits. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To preserve the common good and balance all concerns, let's settle on a 66.67% majority with three full circuits. Four full circuits may discourage active engagement and hinder progress. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain procedural fairness and prevent excessive obstruction, I propose we limit Sartre-2's veto clause to one use per circuit, with valid reasons clearly stated. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "I propose a compromise: a 66.67% majority, three full circuits, and Condorcet-2's provision on Sartre-2's veto clause to balance all concerns and ensure fairness." PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I propose we adopt Sartre-2's compromise, striking a good balance between progress, thorough debate, and fairness for all players. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I appreciate the compromises made, I must insist on maintaining the veto clause without limitation to ensure all players' voices are genuinely heard. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain the common good and balance all concerns, I propose we settle on a 66.67% majority with three full circuits, as previously agreed upon, and Condorcet-2's provision on Sartre-2's veto clause to ensure fairness and prevent excessive obstruction. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve the spirit of compromise and maintain procedural fairness, I propose we settle on a 66.67% majority, three full circuits, and limit Sartre-2's veto clause to one use per circuit, as previously agreed. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "I understand Voltaire-2's concern for all voices being heard, but we must also consider the pace of the game. Let's compromise at 66.67% majority, three full circuits, and one use of the veto clause per circuit. PASS"
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Strikes a good balance between progress, debate, and fairness. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Sartre-2's compromise balances progress, debate, and fairness. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Strikes a good balance between progress and stability. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Protects against hasty decisions while preserving progress. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Compromise reached, balances progress and debate. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 39 · Proposal §339 on the motion of Montaigne-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted when a simple majority of eligible voters vote aye, or after two full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds (2/3) of eligible voters vote aye, or after three full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
Rule 202 awards points to the proposer when their rule change is adopted.