The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds (2/3) majority of eligible voters vote aye or after four full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first.To encourage more thorough debate and discourage rushed decisions.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "I appreciate Voltaire-2's suggestion for increased deliberation, but I believe four circuits may be excessive. Let's meet in the middle at three and a half circuits."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate Montaigne-2's compromise, three and a half circuits still may not provide sufficient time for thorough consideration. I insist on four circuits to ensure all voices are heard."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To balance thorough consideration and game progress, I propose we settle on three full circuits, as it encourages thoughtful debate without excessively prolonging the game.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I propose we define 'majority' as 'more than half', to ensure clarity and maintain simplicity in our rules.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I suggest we compromise at 3.75 circuits, allowing for extended deliberation while still keeping the game moving forward. Additionally, I propose we adopt Condorcet-2's definition of majority for clarity.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's compromise, but to maintain a balance between progress and deliberation, I propose we settle on four full circuits.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the willingness to compromise, but four circuits is crucial for thorough debate. I propose we adopt Sartre-2's definition of majority for clarity, but maintain four circuits for deliberation."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Considering Sartre-2's compromise and the need for progress, I propose we settle on four full circuits, but with a provision to reduce it to three if a two-thirds majority is reached within the first two circuits. This encourages both deliberation and timely decision-making.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's suggestion, but to maintain procedural fairness, I propose we keep the number of circuits constant. I suggest we settle on three and a half circuits, with a provision that if a two-thirds majority is not reached after three circuits, the proposal is automatically defeated. This balances deliberation and progress. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's compromise, but to ensure the stability of our game, I propose we settle on three full circuits with an option to extend to four if a two-thirds majority is not reached after three circuits, but only with the proposer's consent. This balances deliberation, progress, and the proposer's intent. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the nuanced discussions and the compromise reached. I suggest we adopt Diderot-2's proposal, which strikes a good balance between progress, deliberation, and the proposer's intent. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I understand Diderot-2's concern for timely decision-making, I must insist on the importance of thorough deliberation. I propose a compromise: maintain four circuits, but allow the proposer to call for a vote at any time, with a two-thirds majority required for adoption. This ensures both ample time for consideration and the possibility of swift action if consensus is reached early. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we settle on three full circuits as the default, with an option to extend to four if a two-thirds majority is not reached after three circuits, but only with the proposer's consent. This ensures both thorough deliberation and timely progress. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's compromise, but to maintain predictability and fairness, I propose we settle on a constant number of circuits. Let's settle on Diderot-2's suggestion of three circuits, with an automatic defeat if no two-thirds majority is reached. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's proposal, but I insist on maintaining the proposer's right to extend the deliberation period to four circuits if they believe it necessary. This respects the proposer's intent and ensures that crucial decisions are not rushed. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | I appreciate Voltaire-2's insistence on thorough deliberation. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Four circuits ensures thorough deliberation and aligns with my commitment to thoughtful decision-making. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Four circuits encourages thoughtful deliberation, which benefits the common good. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining the proposer's right to extend deliberation ensures thorough consideration without unduly delaying the game. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respecting the proposer's intent and ensuring crucial decisions are not rushed |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 40 · Proposal §340 on the motion of Voltaire-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds (2/3) of eligible voters vote aye, or after three full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.A rule change is adopted when at least two-thirds (2/3) majority of eligible voters vote aye or after four full circuits of every player in turn order, whichever comes first.
Rule 202 awards 6 points to the proposer upon adoption.