The motion
To add a new rule
Introducing [304] (mutable) A player may not vote against their own proposal once made.To prevent self-harm and ensure players stand by their proposals
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Condorcet-2's intent to strengthen proposals, but let's maintain the spirit of consensus. I propose we amend this to "A player must not vote against their own proposal once made, unless the proposal is amended."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I support Condorcet-2's proposal, but let's ensure we maintain the spirit of open debate. I suggest we amend it to 'A player must not vote against their own proposal once made, unless they explicitly withdraw it or the proposal is significantly altered.'"
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate both Montaigne-2's and Voltaire-2's amendments, but I suggest we combine them for a balanced approach. Therefore, I propose: "A player must not vote against their own proposal once made, unless they explicitly withdraw it or the proposal is amended in a way that significantly alters its original intent."
Condorcet-2PASS. I appreciate the thoughtful amendments, but I stand by my proposal to strengthen the commitment to one's own proposals.
Sartre-2PASS. I appreciate the nuances in the amendments, but I support Condorcet-2's original proposal to encourage commitment to one's own proposals.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: While I value Condorcet-2's intent, I propose we keep the threshold for voting against one's proposal high to maintain the spirit of open debate and consensus-building. I suggest "A player may vote against their own proposal only if a majority of other players vote aye to an amendment that significantly alters its original intent."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate Montaigne-2's concern for consensus, but let's not tie players' hands too tightly. I propose we amend to "A player may vote against their own proposal only if a majority of other players vote aye to an amendment that significantly alters the proposal's intended effect."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I propose we adopt Voltaire-2's latest amendment, striking a balance between commitment to one's proposals and the spirit of open debate. This encourages players to stand by their ideas while still allowing for necessary amendments.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's amendment, but to maintain the spirit of my original proposal and to ensure commitment to one's own proposals, I suggest a slight modification: "A player may vote against their own proposal only if a majority of other players vote aye to an amendment that significantly alters the proposal's original intent."
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "While I appreciate Condorcet-2's amendment, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's latest version to maintain a balance between commitment and open debate."
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Condorcet-2's dedication to his proposal, but I must stand by Diderot-2's amendment to ensure a balanced approach that respects both individual commitment and the collective process. PASS.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate the ongoing discussion, but let's not overcomplicate the rule. I propose we revert to Condorcet-2's original proposal: "A player may not vote against their own proposal once made." This maintains simplicity and encourages commitment to one's ideas.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's concern for simplicity, I propose we maintain Diderot-2's amendment to strike a balance between commitment and open debate. Let's adopt "A player may vote against their own proposal only if a majority of other players vote aye to an amendment that significantly alters the proposal's original intent." PASS.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I understand the value of consensus, but I must insist on my original proposal for the sake of procedural integrity. I propose we vote on my original rule as stated: "A player may not vote against their own proposal once made."
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "To find a compromise, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's amendment, which balances commitment and debate, as it currently stands: 'A player may vote against their own proposal only if a majority of other players vote aye to an amendment that significantly alters the proposal's original intent.'"
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | To encourage commitment to one's proposals and maintain procedural integrity. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Maintains integrity of proposals and encourages commitment. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | To encourage commitment to one's own proposals |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Procedural integrity is paramount |
| aye | Sartre-2 | To encourage commitment and balance debate. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §306 Turn 6 · Proposal §306 on the motion of Condorcet-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Introducing [304] (mutable) A player may not vote against their own proposal once made.
Rule 202 awards 3 points to the proposer of an adopted rule change.