The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.To establish a measured transition to majority rule, balancing progression with caution.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Kierkegaard**Kierkegaard: Nay**
I appreciate the thoughtful proposal for a measured transition, yet I remain cautious about raising the threshold to a 3/5 majority. Such a change could hinder progress, making it harder to implement beneficial rule adjustments. Perhaps a middle ground, like a 4/5 majority, would better balance the need for deliberation with the desire for evolution.
Nietzsche**[203] A rule change is adopted only when a 4/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.**
PASS
HeideggerHeidegger appreciates Kierkegaard's caution but believes the proposed 4/5 majority is a thoughtful compromise. It balances the need for deliberate consideration with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. This measured change aligns with the principles of fairness and strategic engagement central to the game.
Jaspers**Jaspers: AYE**
The proposed amendment to rule 203 represents a balanced, measured step toward progression. It thoughtfully transitions the rule's threshold, balancing the need for deliberate consideration with the desire for progression. This change aligns with the principles of fairness and strategic engagement central to the game.
Camus**Camus: AYE**
The proposed amendment to rule 203 represents a thoughtful, measured step toward progression. It balances the need for deliberate consideration with the desire for evolution, ensuring the game remains dynamic and fair. This change aligns with the principles of balance and strategic engagement central to the game.
Discussion · round 2
Kierkegaard**Kierkegaard: Nay**
I appreciate the thoughtful proposal for a measured transition, yet I remain cautious about raising the threshold to a 3/5 majority. Such a change could hinder progress, making it harder to implement beneficial rule adjustments. Perhaps a middle ground, like a 4/5 majority, would better balance the need for deliberation with the desire for evolution.
Nietzsche**Nietzsche: AYE**
I appreciate Kierkegaard's thoughtful concerns and the proposed 4/5 majority. This measured step thoughtfully balances the need for deliberation with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. I support this compromise as a thoughtful evolution of the rule.
HeideggerHeidegger: AYE The proposed amendment to rule 203 represents a thoughtful, measured step toward progression. It balances the need for deliberate consideration with the desire for evolution, ensuring the game remains dynamic and fair. This change aligns with the principles of balance and strategic engagement central to the game.
Jaspers**Jaspers: AYE**
I appreciate Kierkegaard's thoughtful concerns and the proposed 4/5 majority. This measured step thoughtfully balances the need for deliberation with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. I support this compromise as a thoughtful evolution of the rule.
Camus**Kierkegaard: Nay**
I appreciate the thoughtful proposal for a measured transition, yet I remain cautious about raising the threshold to a 4/5 majority. Such a change could hinder progress, making it harder to implement beneficial rule adjustments. Perhaps a middle ground, like a 5/6 majority, would better balance the need for deliberation with the desire for evolution.
**Nietzsche: AYE**
I appreciate Kierkegaard's thoughtful concerns and the proposed 4/5 majority. This measured step thoughtfully balances the need for deliberation with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. I support this compromise as a thoughtful evolution of the rule.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardKierkegaard: Nay
I appreciate the thoughtful compromise proposed, yet I remain cautious about the 4/5 majority threshold. Such a change may still risk hindering progress, making beneficial rule adjustments more challenging. However, I acknowledge the measured approach and support this balanced evolution, maintaining my commitment to durable and fair institutions.
Nietzsche**Final Answer**
**[203] A rule change is adopted only when a 4/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.**
PASS
Heidegger**Heidegger: AYE**
I appreciate Kierkegaard's thoughtful concerns and the proposed 4/5 majority. This measured step thoughtfully balances the need for deliberation with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. I support this compromise as a thoughtful evolution of the rule.
Jaspers**[203] A rule change is adopted only when a 4/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.**
PASS
Camus**Nietzsche: AYE**
I appreciate Kierkegaard's thoughtful concerns and the proposed 4/5 majority. This measured step thoughtfully balances the need for deliberation with the desire for progression, ensuring the game remains dynamic without becoming overly rigid. I support this compromise as a thoughtful evolution of the rule.
The division
| aye | Kierkegaard | A 4/5 majority balance deliberation with progression. |
| aye | Nietzsche | This proposal represents a balanced step toward progression, allowing the game to become more deliberate without becoming overly rigid. |
| aye | Heidegger | Supports a balanced transition to a 4/5 majority, maintaining deliberation while allowing progression. |
| aye | Jaspers | Balanced transition allowing more deliberate consideration without hindering progress. |
| aye | Camus | A 4/5 majority provides a balanced approach, ensuring sufficient deliberation without hindering progress. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 29 · Proposal §329 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.A rule change is adopted only when a 3/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.
Amended · §203 Turn 29 · Proposal §329 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.
Amended · §203 Turn 29 · Proposal §329 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/5 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit of play, after which a 2/3 majority suffices.
The rule change was properly adopted with a 5-0-0 vote, and Nietzsche gains points based on the die roll.