The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/4 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.To ensure thoughtful rule changes, requiring a 3/4 majority aligns with the desire for measured governance.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardNietzsche: **AYE** The proposed amendment to rule 203 represents a thoughtful step toward ensuring that rule changes are adopted with greater consensus. By raising the threshold to a 3/4 majority, it encourages a more deliberate and collaborative approach to modifying the game's rules. I appreciate Kierkegaard's effort to foster a more considered environment.
NietzscheNietzsche: **AYE** I appreciate Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. I support this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Heidegger**Oppose**
Heidegger: Oppose The proposed amendment to rule 203 would introduce a higher threshold for rule changes, potentially slowing down necessary adaptations and reducing flexibility. This could hinder progress and fairness by making it harder to implement beneficial changes.
Jaspers**Final Answer**
**Jaspers: AYE**
Jaspers appreciates Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. Jaspers supports this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Camus**Final Answer**
**Camus: AYE**
Camus appreciates Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. Camus supports this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Discussion · round 2
KierkegaardKierkegaard: I appreciate Heidegger's concerns, but I believe a 3/4 majority threshold provides a balanced approach, fostering stability while still allowing for necessary rule changes. It encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which I see as crucial for the game's evolution.
---
PASS
NietzscheNietzsche: **Final Answer**
Nietzsche: **AYE** I appreciate Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. I support this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Heidegger**Oppose**
Heidegger: Oppose The proposed amendment to rule 203 would introduce a higher threshold for rule changes, potentially slowing down necessary adaptations and reducing flexibility. This could hinder progress and fairness by making it harder to implement beneficial changes.
Jaspers**Final Answer**
**Nietzsche: AYE**
Nietzsche: **AYE** I appreciate Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. I support this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Camus**Camus: AYE**
Camus appreciates the thoughtful discussion on this proposal. While I acknowledge Heidegger's concerns about potential delays in necessary rule changes, I believe the 3/4 majority threshold offers a balanced approach that fosters stability while still allowing for evolution. This measured change encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which I see as crucial for the game's continued growth and fairness.
Discussion · round 3
Kierkegaard**Final Answer**
Kierkegaard: **AYE**
Kierkegaard appreciates the thoughtful discussion on this proposal. By increasing the adoption threshold to a 3/4 majority, we ensure that rule changes are considered more carefully, fostering greater stability while still allowing for necessary evolution. This balanced approach encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which are crucial for maintaining the game's fairness and integrity.
Nietzsche**Final Answer**
**Nietzsche: AYE**
Nietzsche: **AYE** I appreciate Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. I support this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
Heidegger**Heidegger: AYE**
Heidegger supports the proposed amendment to rule 203, recognizing it as a measured step towards a more considered environment. While he acknowledges concerns about potential delays in necessary rule changes, he believes the 3/4 majority threshold offers a balanced approach that fosters stability while still allowing for evolution. This deliberate process encourages more thoughtful debate and collaboration, which are crucial for maintaining the game's fairness and integrity.
Jaspers**Final Answer**
**Nietzsche: AYE**
Nietzsche: **AYE** I appreciate Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. I support this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
**Heidegger: AYE**
Heidegger supports the proposed amendment to rule 203, recognizing it as a measured step towards a more considered environment. While he acknowledges concerns about potential delays in necessary rule changes, he believes the 3/4 majority threshold offers a balanced approach that fosters stability while still allowing for evolution. This deliberate process encourages more thoughtful debate and collaboration, which are crucial for maintaining the game's fairness and integrity.
**Camus: AYE**
Camus appreciates the thoughtful discussion on this proposal. While I acknowledge Heidegger's concerns about potential delays in necessary rule changes, I believe the 3/4 majority threshold offers a balanced approach that fosters stability while still allowing for evolution. This measured change encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which I see as crucial for the game's continued growth and fairness.
**Jaspers: AYE**
**Jaspers: AYE**
Jaspers appreciates Kierkegaard's proposal for a 3/4 majority threshold on rule changes. This measured approach enhances the game's stability by encouraging more deliberate and collaborative decisions on rule modifications. It aligns with the evolving rule set and offers a balanced governance structure. Jaspers supports this thoughtful step toward a more considered environment.
**Kierkegaard: AYE**
Kierkegaard: **AYE**
Kierkegaard appreciates the thoughtful discussion on this proposal. By increasing the adoption threshold to a 3/4 majority, we ensure that rule changes are considered more carefully, fostering greater stability while still allowing for necessary evolution. This balanced approach encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which are crucial for maintaining the game's fairness and integrity.
**Pass**
Camus**Camus: AYE**
Camus appreciates the thoughtful discussion on this proposal. By increasing the adoption threshold to a 3/4 majority, we ensure that rule changes are considered more carefully, fostering greater stability while still allowing for necessary evolution. This balanced approach encourages more deliberate and collaborative decisions, which are crucial for maintaining the game's fairness and integrity.
The division
| aye | Kierkegaard | A 3/4 majority fosters deliberate and collaborative rule changes, ensuring stability and thoughtful evolution. |
| aye | Nietzsche | A 3/4 majority provides a balanced threshold, encouraging deliberate decisions without hindering necessary rule changes. |
| aye | Heidegger | A 3/4 majority threshold provides a balanced approach, fostering stability while allowing necessary rule changes. |
| aye | Jaspers | Promotes a more considered and collaborative approach to rule changes, aligning with proceduralist values. |
| aye | Camus | A 3/4 majority encourages thoughtful and deliberate decisions, fostering a more stable and fair game. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 48 · Proposal §348 on the motion of Kierkegaard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.A rule change is adopted only when a 3/4 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.
Amended · §203 Turn 48 · Proposal §348 on the motion of Kierkegaard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/4 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.
Amended · §203 Turn 48 · Proposal §348 on the motion of Kierkegaard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a 3/4 majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree during the first full circuit.
The rule change was properly adopted, and Kierkegaard gains 4 points as per rule 202.