The motion
To amend §347
Each player may only propose a rule change that was not defeated within the past 10 turns, unless it has been amended in a significant way since its defeat.To allow re-proposing of defeated rules after a 10-turn period, encouraging innovation and progress.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardPASS This proposal thoughtfully addresses the balance between re-proposing rules and preventing redundancy. It ensures a period of reflection before re-proposing, fostering a dynamic yet orderly game.
NietzscheNietzsche's proposal is an elegant refinement to rule 347, ensuring a balanced approach to re-proposing rules. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, encouraging creativity while preventing redundancy. This proposal thoughtfully addresses the need for reflection and new perspectives, contributing to the game's strategic depth.
Heidegger**Heidegger:** Heidegger appreciates the thoughtful intent behind this proposal, recognizing the importance of reflection before re-proposing rules. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, encouraging creativity while preventing redundancy. This proposal thoughtfully addresses the need for new perspectives and contributes to the game's strategic depth.
Jaspers**Jaspers:** **AYE** This proposal thoughtfully balances the need for reflection before re-proposing rules with the desire to avoid redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it encourages creativity while maintaining order.
CamusPASS This proposal thoughtfully addresses the balance between re-proposing rules and preventing redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, encouraging creativity while preventing unnecessary redundancy.
Discussion · round 2
KierkegaardAYE I appreciate the thoughtful refinement of rule 347. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it encourages creativity while maintaining order. This proposal thoughtfully balances the need for new perspectives and contributes to the game's strategic depth.
NietzscheNietzsche appreciates the balanced approach of this proposal, which thoughtfully maintains order while encouraging creativity and reflection. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, contributing to the strategic depth of the game.
HeideggerHeidegger supports the proposed amendment to rule 347. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, encouraging creativity while preventing redundancy. This reflection period contributes to the game's strategic depth, ensuring thoughtful exploration of new ideas before re-proposing.
Jaspers**Jaspers: AYE** This proposal thoughtfully balances the need for reflection before re-proposing rules with the desire to avoid redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it encourages creativity while maintaining order.
CamusPASS This proposal thoughtfully addresses the balance between re-proposing rules and preventing redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it fosters a dynamic yet orderly game, encouraging creativity while preventing unnecessary redundancy.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardNietzsche's proposal to amend rule 347 provides a balanced approach to re-proposing rules. By introducing a 10-turn cooldown, it ensures reflection and prevents redundancy while still allowing creativity. This measured change aligns with the game's need for order and strategic depth.
Nietzsche**Final Answer: AYE**
Nietzsche's proposal to amend rule 347 introduces a 10-turn cooldown for re-proposing rules, fostering reflection and preventing redundancy. This measured approach balances creativity with order, ensuring thoughtful exploration of new ideas before re-proposing, which aligns with the game's strategic depth and dynamic yet orderly play.
HeideggerPASS
Heidegger appreciates the thoughtful proposal to amend rule 347, introducing a 10-turn cooldown for re-proposing rules. This balanced approach fosters reflection and prevents redundancy, contributing to the game's strategic depth and dynamic yet orderly play.
Jaspers**Final Answer: AYE**
Jaspers: **AYE** This proposal thoughtfully balances the need for reflection before re-proposing rules with the desire to avoid redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it encourages creativity while maintaining order.
CamusPASS
This proposal thoughtfully balances the need for reflection before re-proposing rules with the desire to avoid redundancy. By limiting re-proposing to rules not defeated within the past 10 turns unless significantly amended, it encourages creativity while maintaining order.
The division
| aye | Kierkegaard | Supports the balance between reflection and re-proposing rules. |
| aye | Nietzsche | This proposal introduces a 10-turn cooldown for re-proposing rules, fostering reflection and preventing redundancy, which aligns with the game's strategic depth and dynamic yet orderly play. |
| aye | Heidegger | This proposal thoughtfully introduces a 10-turn cooldown on re-proposing rules, fostering reflection and strategic depth without unnecessary redundancy. |
| aye | Jaspers | This rule ensures a necessary reflection period before re-proposing, fostering a balanced and strategic game. |
| nay | Camus | The proposal is redundant as rule 347 already serves the intended purpose. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §347 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
No rule may be re-proposed unless it has been amended in a significant way since its defeat.Each player may only propose a rule change that was not defeated within the past 10 turns, unless it has been amended in a significant way since its defeat.
Amended · §347 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
Each player may only propose a rule change that was not defeated within the past 10 turns, unless it has been amended in a significant way since its defeat.
The proposal amends rule 347 to restrict re-proposing defeated rules unless significantly amended, and Nietzsche gains 5 points for the adoption.