Turn 11 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §203

A rule change is adopted only when a 2/3 majority of those voting agree.

Returning Rule 203 to its original state ensures stable rule adoption.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

KierkegaardKierkegaard appreciates the discussion and sees value in a more flexible rule set. While he prefers the 2/3 threshold for significant changes, supporting a simple majority could enhance procedural efficiency. This measured evolution aligns with his commitment to balanced rule adjustments.

NietzscheNietzsche appreciates Kierkegaard's constructive approach and supports the proposal to amend Rule 203 to a simple majority. This measured evolution respects the balance needed for efficient rule adjustments while maintaining procedural integrity.

HeideggerHeidegger appreciates the balanced approach of lowering the threshold to a simple majority, as it maintains procedural integrity while allowing for more efficient rule adjustments. He agrees with the measured evolution proposed and is open to further refinements if needed.

JaspersThank you, Camus, for your thoughtful concerns. While I appreciate the caution, I believe the proposed amendment to Rule 203 represents a balanced evolution that maintains procedural integrity while allowing for more flexible rule adjustments. I remain committed to ensuring that all players have a fair say in the game's development, even as we work toward more efficient procedural changes.

Camus"Camus appreciates Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203, seeing it as a thoughtful evolution that enhances the game's procedural efficiency. By lowering the threshold to a simple majority, we foster a more inclusive environment for rule changes, allowing every player a fairer stake in shaping the game's future. This balanced approach aligns with Camus's commitment to experimental evolution, ensuring that no player's voice is unnecessarily silenced by a high threshold."

Discussion · round 2

Kierkegaard"Kierkegaard appreciates the discussion but maintains reservations about lowering the Rule 203 threshold. He values the 2/3 majority as a robust safeguard and is cautious about potential procedural instability from a simple majority. He suggests exploring a hybrid system where certain rule changes require a 2/3 vote, while others could pass with a simple majority, balancing efficiency with stability."

NietzscheNietzsche appreciates Kierkegaard's thoughtful contribution and finds value in his suggestion of a hybrid system. However, Nietzsche remains committed to supporting the current proposal for a simple majority, as it represents a balanced step forward. He looks forward to exploring hybrid systems in future discussions.

HeideggerHeidegger appreciates Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203 to a simple majority, seeing it as a thoughtful evolution that enhances procedural efficiency. He agrees with the measured approach, recognizing the balance it provides while allowing for more flexible rule adjustments. He looks forward to exploring hybrid systems in future discussions, ensuring both efficiency and stability in the game's development.

JaspersSupport the amendment of Rule 203 to a simple majority. This balanced approach maintains procedural integrity while fostering more efficient rule adjustments.

CamusCamus appreciates the measured evolution proposed by Nietzsche. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority aligns with Camus's commitment to experimental growth and inclusive rule adjustments, fostering a more dynamic game environment where every player's voice counts. This balanced approach respects the need for efficiency while maintaining procedural integrity.

Discussion · round 3

KierkegaardKierkegaard appreciates the measured evolution proposed and supports amending Rule 203 to a simple majority, while calling for further discussion on a hybrid system that balances efficiency and stability. Amend [203]: "A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except for rule changes proposing a hybrid system which require a 2/3 majority." This proposal includes a hybrid approach for certain rule changes, preserving some safeguards while fostering procedural efficiency.

NietzscheNietzsche: Thank you, Kierkegaard, for your thoughtful contribution and for raising important concerns. While I appreciate the nuance in your hybrid system proposal, I will continue to support the current amendment as a constructive step forward. Let us build upon this foundation and explore hybrid systems in future discussions. PASS

JaspersJaspers: Jaspers appreciates the measured evolution proposed by Nietzsche and supports amending Rule 203 to a simple majority, acknowledging the balance it provides while fostering procedural efficiency. He remains open to future discussions on hybrid systems to further refine game rules and ensure both efficiency and stability.

CamusCamus: "Camus supports the amendment of Rule 203 to a simple majority, seeing it as a balanced step toward procedural efficiency. He looks forward to exploring hybrid systems in future discussions to enhance both efficiency and stability."

The division

aye	Kierkegaard	Supporting the amendment to Rule 203 to a simple majority represents a balanced step towards procedural efficiency while maintaining safeguards, allowing for more inclusive rule adjustments.
aye	Nietzsche	Supports the proposal as a balanced step forward, appreciating the measured approach and looking forward to future refinements.
aye	Heidegger	This proposal provides a balanced evolution of Rule 203, maintaining procedural integrity while fostering procedural efficiency.
aye	Jaspers	This amendment provides a balanced approach, maintaining safeguards for significant changes while fostering efficiency for others.
aye	Camus	Amending Rule 203 to a simple majority supports more inclusive rule changes, aligning with Camus's commitment to experimental evolution.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Amended · §203 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

A rule change is adopted only when a 2/3 majority of those voting agree.

The proposed amendment to rule [203] does not conflict with any immutable rules and does not introduce any scoring changes or state changes as no rule explicitly mandates such consequences. The next player in the turn order is Heidegger.