The motion
To amend §209
A rule may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time. This rule is made immutable.To ensure game stability by limiting mutable rules.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardI appreciate the discussion surrounding the amendment of Rule 209. Making it immutable ensures the cap on mutable rules remains fixed, providing stability and preventing potential overcomplication of the game. This change aligns with my value for durable institutions, ensuring the game's long-term integrity. I will support this proposal.
**aye**
Nietzsche**Nietzsche:** I appreciate Kierkegaard's support and Camus's thoughtful concerns. Making Rule 209 immutable will ensure a consistent cap on mutable rules, fostering a more predictable and organized game environment. This stability aligns with our shared values of integrity and long-term sustainability. I am confident this change will benefit the game. **aye**
HeideggerHeidegger appreciates the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. This change provides stability by ensuring a consistent cap on mutable rules, which helps maintain the game's integrity and predictability. By limiting the number of mutable rules, it prevents potential overcomplication and ensures the game remains balanced and structured. **aye**
Jaspers**Camus:** As Camus, I appreciate the discussion surrounding the amendment of Rule 209. While the proposal for immutability offers stability, I value the flexibility it provides for future adjustments. Keeping Rule 209 mutable ensures the cap on mutable rules remains adaptable, allowing the game to evolve as needed. I would prefer to maintain this flexibility for future considerations.
**abstain**
Camus**abstain**
I appreciate the discussion surrounding the amendment of Rule 209. While making it immutable offers stability, I value the flexibility it provides for future adjustments. Keeping Rule 209 mutable ensures the cap on mutable rules remains adaptable, allowing the game to evolve as needed.
Discussion · round 2
Kierkegaard**abstain**
I appreciate the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable, as it offers stability. However, I value the flexibility this rule provides for future adjustments, ensuring the game remains adaptable as needed. By abstaining, I keep the option open for future considerations while supporting the principle of stability.
Nietzsche**Nietzsche:** I appreciate Camus's concerns about flexibility. Let us consider a compromise: instead of making Rule 209 immutable, we could instead add a condition that allows for temporary adjustments under specific circumstances, such as during critical game phases. This would balance stability with necessary adaptability. **abstain until further discussion**
Heidegger**aye**
I support the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. This change ensures a consistent cap on mutable rules, providing stability and preventing potential overcomplication of the game. By maintaining this cap indefinitely, we protect the game's integrity and ensure that future adjustments can still be made within the allowable mutable rules.
Jaspers**abstain**
I appreciate the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable, as it offers stability. However, I value the flexibility this rule provides for future adjustments, ensuring the game remains adaptable as needed. By abstaining, I keep the option open for future considerations while supporting the principle of stability.
Camus**aye**
Camus: **aye**
I appreciate the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. While I value flexibility for future adjustments, the stability this change provides is essential for maintaining game integrity. By supporting this proposal, I ensure the cap on mutable rules remains consistent, allowing us to adapt as needed while preserving necessary structure.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardKierkegaard supports the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. He values the stability it provides, ensuring a consistent cap on mutable rules. This aligns with his preference for durable institutions and the game's long-term integrity. He appreciates the discussion but remains committed to the proposal for the sake of game structure and predictability. **aye**
**aye**
Nietzsche**Nietzsche:** I appreciate Camus's and Jaspers's concerns about flexibility. Let us consider a compromise: instead of making Rule 209 immutable, we could instead add a condition that allows for temporary adjustments under specific circumstances, such as during critical game phases. This would balance stability with necessary adaptability. **abstain until further discussion**
Heidegger**aye**
Heidegger supports the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. This change provides stability by ensuring a consistent cap on mutable rules, which helps maintain the game's integrity and predictability. By limiting the number of mutable rules, it prevents potential overcomplication and ensures the game remains balanced and structured.
Jaspersabstain
Camus**aye**
Camus: Camus appreciates the proposal to make Rule 209 immutable. While he values flexibility for future adjustments, the stability this change provides is essential for maintaining game integrity and predictability. By supporting this proposal, Camus ensures the cap on mutable rules remains consistent, allowing the game to adapt as needed while preserving necessary structure.
The division
| aye | Kierkegaard | Supporting immutability ensures a consistent cap on mutable rules, aligning with Kierkegaard's values for durability and game integrity. |
| abstain | Nietzsche | Making Rule 209 immutable provides stability but may limit future flexibility. A compromise could involve adding conditions for temporary rule increases, ensuring both stability and necessary adaptability. |
| aye | Heidegger | Making Rule 209 immutable ensures a consistent cap on mutable rules, providing stability for the game's integrity and structure. |
| abstain | Jaspers | Jaspers values flexibility for future adjustments while supporting necessary stability. |
| aye | Camus | Supporting the proposal for game stability and integrity. |
carried 3 aye · 0 nay · 2 abstain
As engrossed
Amended · §209 Turn 19 · Proposal §318 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 3 aye · 0 nay · 2 abstain
The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.A rule may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time. This rule is made immutable.
The proposal to transmute Rule 209 into an immutable rule was defeated due to lacking unanimous assent, resulting in no rule change and a 10-point penalty to Nietzsche.