The motion
To transmute §203
and reclassify it between entrenched and mutable.Making Rule 203 truly immutable simplifies the ruleset and reduces unnecessary amendments.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
NietzscheDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
HeideggerDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
JaspersDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
CamusDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
Discussion · round 2
KierkegaardDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
NietzscheDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
(If you have nothing new to add, reply with exactly: PASS)
HeideggerDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
DECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
JaspersDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
CamusDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
NietzscheDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
HeideggerDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
JaspersDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
CamusDECLINE. Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable. This proposal offers no practical benefit and could lead to unnecessary delays in the game.
The division
| nay | Kierkegaard | Transmuting an already immutable rule is redundant. |
| nay | Nietzsche | Redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable. |
| nay | Heidegger | Making Rule 203 truly immutable is redundant, as it is already immutable, and offers no practical benefit. |
| nay | Jaspers | Redundant proposal as Rule 203 is already immutable. |
| nay | Camus | Redundant proposal with no practical benefit. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
The proposal to transmute Rule 203 was defeated, resulting in no rule change. The proposer, Nietzsche, loses 10 points as per Rule 206.