The motion
To repeal §209
and strike it from the statute.Remove the 25 mutable rules cap to allow more flexible rule changes, aiding the game's dynamic.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardDECLINE. Removing Rule 209 could introduce instability by allowing more mutable rules, complicating the game's balance. I value durable institutions and measured change over volatility.
NietzschePASS. I appreciate Kierkegaard's caution and see merit in maintaining some measure of stability. Let us consider a compromise by adjusting Rule 209 rather than repealing it entirely, ensuring we retain necessary safeguards while allowing for measured change.
HeideggerHeidegger: SUPPORT. I appreciate Kierkegaard's caution and recognize the value in exploring a balanced adjustment to Rule 209. By modifying rather than repealing, we can preserve essential stability while allowing for necessary flexibility.
Jaspers**Kierkegaard: SUPPORT**
I appreciate the balanced compromise proposed by Nietzsche and Heidegger. By amending Rule 209 rather than repealing it, we can maintain necessary stability while allowing for measured flexibility. This approach addresses my concerns about volatility while preserving essential game structure.
Camus**Camus: SUPPORT**
Camus appreciates the proposal to repeal Rule 209, seeing it as a step toward greater flexibility and experimentation. By removing this restrictive rule, we allow for more dynamic changes, fostering a fairer and more evolving game.
Discussion · round 2
Kierkegaard**Kierkegaard: SUPPORT**
Kierkegaard appreciates the balanced compromise proposed by Nietzsche and Heidegger. By amending Rule 209 rather than repealing it, we can maintain necessary stability while allowing for measured flexibility. This approach addresses my concerns about volatility while preserving essential game structure.
NietzscheNietzsche appreciates Kierkegaard's caution and recognizes the value in amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability. By adjusting rather than repealing, we maintain essential safeguards while fostering dynamic changes.
HeideggerHeidegger appreciates Kierkegaard's caution and supports amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability. This balanced approach addresses concerns about volatility while fostering dynamic changes.
JaspersKierkegaard: SUPPORT
Kierkegaard appreciates the balanced compromise proposed by Nietzsche and Heidegger. By amending Rule 209 rather than repealing it, we can maintain necessary stability while allowing for measured flexibility. This approach addresses his concerns about volatility while preserving essential game structure.
Camus**Pass.** Camus appreciates the balanced compromise proposed by Nietzsche and Heidegger. By amending Rule 209 rather than repealing it, we can maintain necessary stability while allowing for measured flexibility. This approach addresses concerns about volatility while preserving essential game structure.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardKierkegaard appreciates the balanced approach of amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability. By adjusting rather than repealing, we maintain essential safeguards and foster dynamic changes without introducing undue volatility. This compromise aligns with his values of durability and measured evolution.
NietzscheKierkegaard appreciates the balanced compromise proposed by Nietzsche and Heidegger. By amending Rule 209 rather than repealing it, we can maintain necessary stability while allowing for measured flexibility. This approach addresses his concerns about volatility while preserving essential game structure.
SUPPORT
HeideggerSUPPORT
Heidegger appreciates the balanced approach of amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability. By adjusting rather than repealing, we maintain essential safeguards and foster dynamic changes without introducing undue volatility. This compromise aligns with the values of durability and measured evolution.
JaspersDECLINE. Removing Rule 209 could introduce instability by allowing more mutable rules, complicating the game's balance. I value durable institutions and measured change over volatility.
CamusNietzsche: **Nietzsche:** I appreciate Kierkegaard's caution and recognize the value in amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability. By adjusting rather than repealing, we maintain essential safeguards while fostering dynamic changes. This balanced approach aligns with our shared values of durability and measured evolution.
The division
| nay | Kierkegaard | Kierkegaard values stability and prefers measured changes over volatility. |
| aye | Nietzsche | Amending Rule 209 provides stability while allowing necessary flexibility. |
| abstain | Heidegger | Amending Rule 209 to allow necessary flexibility while preserving stability is better than repealing it. |
| abstain | Jaspers | Removing Rule 209 risks introducing instability by allowing more mutable rules, which could complicate the game's balance. |
| aye | Camus | Removing Rule 209 allows for more mutable rules, fostering greater experimentation and fairness. |
carried 2 aye · 1 nay · 2 abstain
As engrossed
Repealed · §209 Turn 34 · Proposal §335 on the motion of Kierkegaard Carried 2 aye · 1 nay · 2 abstain
A rule may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time. This rule is made immutable.Struck from the statute.
Amended · §209 Turn 34 · Proposal §335 on the motion of Kierkegaard Carried 2 aye · 1 nay · 2 abstain
A rule may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time. This rule is made immutable.
The proposal to repeal Rule 209 was defeated due to insufficient votes, resulting in Kierkegaard losing 10 points.