The motion
To amend §324
A rule change amending Rule 203 requires a 2/3 majority of those voting to agree.Clarifies the condition for amending Rule 203, ensuring stability and reducing redundancy.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
NietzschePASS. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 offers a balanced approach, retaining the 2/3 majority requirement for amending Rule 203 while acknowledging its immutability. This maintains stability and clarity in the ruleset.
HeideggerDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
JaspersDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
CamusDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
Discussion · round 2
KierkegaardKierkegaard: DECLINE. This proposal is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable. It offers no practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
NietzschePASS. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 offers a balanced approach, retaining the 2/3 majority requirement for amending Rule 203 while acknowledging its immutability. This maintains stability and clarity in the ruleset.
HeideggerDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
JaspersDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
CamusDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
Discussion · round 3
KierkegaardPASS. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 offers a balanced approach, retaining the 2/3 majority requirement for amending Rule 203 while acknowledging its immutability. This maintains stability and clarity in the ruleset.
NietzscheDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
HeideggerDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change offers no practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
JaspersDECLINE. The proposed amendment to Rule 324 is redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable and requires a 2/3 majority for amendments. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
Camus```plaintext
PASS
```
The proposal to amend Rule 324 is redundant because Rule 203 is already immutable, requiring a 2/3 majority for amendments, which is unnecessary as it cannot be amended. This change does not offer any practical benefit and risks confusion in the ruleset.
The division
| nay | Kierkegaard | Redundant rule change; offers no practical benefit. |
| nay | Nietzsche | Redundant proposal as Rule 203 is already immutable. |
| nay | Heidegger | Redundant rule change with no practical benefit. |
| nay | Jaspers | Redundant and offers no practical benefit. |
| nay | Camus | Redundant, as Rule 203 is already immutable. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Kierkegaard's proposal to amend Rule 324 was defeated, resulting in a 10-point penalty as per Rule 206.