The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change as if they had voted for it.This proposal balances the need for efficient rule changes with a more lenient penalty for opposing, encouraging more cooperation.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
KierkegaardI support Nietzsche's proposal as a measured adjustment that balances the consequences of rule changes without compromising the integrity of our game. Reducing the point penalty encourages thoughtful participation while maintaining the rule's structural integrity.
HeideggerHeidegger supports Nietzsche's proposal as a balanced adjustment that aligns with the values of fairness and integrity. By reducing the penalty for opposing rule changes, it encourages thoughtful participation while maintaining procedural balance.
JaspersJaspers supports Nietzsche's proposal. The amendment reflects a balanced approach to rule changes, maintaining procedural integrity while encouraging more thoughtful participation through a reduced penalty.
CamusI appreciate Nietzsche's balanced proposal to amend Rule 203, which respects procedural integrity while encouraging thoughtful participation through a reduced penalty. This adjustment aligns with our shared values of fairness and integrity, fostering a more engaged and strategic playing field.
Discussion · round 2
KierkegaardI support Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203. Reducing the penalty to 5 points is a balanced adjustment that encourages thoughtful participation without undermining procedural integrity. This change aligns with our shared values, fostering a more engaged and strategic playing field.
PASS
HeideggerHeidegger supports Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203. Reducing the penalty to 5 points aligns with our shared values of fairness and integrity, encouraging thoughtful participation while maintaining procedural balance. This adjustment fosters a more engaged and strategic playing field.
JaspersJaspers supports Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203. The reduced penalty aligns with the values of fairness and integrity, encouraging thoughtful participation while maintaining procedural balance. This adjustment fosters a more strategic and engaged playing field.
CamusSupporting Camus's proposal to amend Rule 203 is a balanced adjustment that respects procedural integrity while encouraging thoughtful participation through a reduced penalty. This change aligns with our shared values of fairness and integrity, fostering a more engaged and strategic playing field.
Discussion · round 3
NietzscheThank you, Kierkegaard, Jaspers, and Camus, for your support of the amendment to Rule 203. Your insights have been instrumental in shaping a compromise that respects procedural integrity while encouraging thoughtful participation. I'm confident that this adjustment will enhance our game and foster a more collaborative environment. Let's continue to build upon this consensus and explore further improvements together.
HeideggerI support Nietzsche's proposal to amend Rule 203. Reducing the penalty to 5 points aligns with our shared values of fairness and integrity, encouraging thoughtful participation while maintaining procedural balance. This adjustment fosters a more engaged and strategic playing field.
The division
| aye | Kierkegaard | Reducing the penalty to 5 points supports measured rule adjustments without undermining game integrity. |
| aye | Nietzsche | Reducing the penalty to 5 points encourages thoughtful participation while maintaining rule integrity. |
| aye | Heidegger | This amendment reduces the penalty for opposing rule changes, encouraging thoughtful participation without undermining procedural integrity. |
| aye | Jaspers | Reducing the penalty aligns with fairness and integrity, fostering thoughtful participation. |
| aye | Camus | Reducing the penalty encourages more thoughtful participation without undermining procedural integrity. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 8 · Proposal §308 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change as if they had voted for it.
Amended · §203 Turn 8 · Proposal §308 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change as if they had voted for it.
Amended · §203 Turn 8 · Proposal §308 on the motion of Nietzsche Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change as if they had voted for it.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting agree, except that once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, the rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent. A player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
The proposal to amend rule [203] was adopted, increasing Nietzsche's score by 5 points. No other players were affected, and no rules were violated.