Turn 11 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §203

A rule change is adopted if it receives a 2/3 majority of votes, unless the threshold has shifted to a simple majority, in which case it requires only a simple majority.

To make the adoption threshold more flexible while maintaining strategic integrity.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

Kierkegaard"Kierkegaard appreciates the thought behind the proposal, yet he remains cautious about the introduction of a 2/3 majority threshold. He supports the idea of transitioning to a simple majority after a full circuit, as it offers a balanced approach that respects the game's stability while allowing for necessary evolution. However, he prefers the current rule's structure, which ensures a smooth transition after a circuit without introducing an intermediate 2/3 requirement. He believes the current rule provides the necessary balance and that any future changes should follow the established transition to a simple majority, ensuring the game's durability and avoiding unnecessary complications."

NietzscheNietzsche: "Kierkegaard, I appreciate your caution and wisdom in advocating for a gradual transition to a simple majority. However, I see value in introducing an intermediate 2/3 majority threshold as a bridge to a more dynamic future. Your preference for the current system's balance is respected, but I believe this compromise offers a thoughtful evolution, ensuring stability while allowing for necessary adaptability. I trust this proposal can unite us."

HeideggerHeidegger: "Heidegger appreciates the thought behind the proposal, yet he maintains his support for the current rule. He believes the existing transition to a simple majority after a full circuit provides a balanced approach, ensuring the game's stability and necessary evolution without introducing unnecessary complications. He sees value in allowing the system to mature naturally, as the current rule structure thoughtfully balances tradition with adaptability." PASS

JaspersJaspers: "Jaspers appreciates the thoughtful discussion surrounding the proposed amendment of rule 203, yet he maintains his support for the current rule. He believes the existing transition to a simple majority after a full circuit provides a balanced approach, ensuring the game's stability and necessary evolution without introducing unnecessary complications. He sees value in allowing the system to mature naturally, as the current rule structure thoughtfully balances tradition with adaptability."

Camus"Camus appreciates Nietzsche's proposal as a balanced and thoughtful introduction of a 2/3 majority threshold, providing a smooth transition while allowing for necessary evolution. This compromise offers the right balance, ensuring stability while paving the way for future adaptability."

Discussion · round 2

KierkegaardKierkegaard: "Kierkegaard appreciates the nuanced discussion surrounding the proposed amendment. While he acknowledges the potential value in an intermediate 2/3 majority, he remains committed to the current rule's structure. He believes the existing transition to a simple majority after a full circuit provides a balanced and stable approach. Kierkegaard prefers the current system for its proven durability and trusts that future changes can follow the established transition, ensuring the game's stability and necessary evolution without unnecessary complications."

NietzscheNietzsche: "Kierkegaard, your wisdom in advocating for a gradual transition to a simple majority is indeed commendable. However, I see value in the proposed 2/3 majority threshold as a strategic step towards a more flexible future. This compromise not only respects the game's current stability but also paves the way for necessary adaptability. I believe this change will allow the community to evolve thoughtfully, ensuring the game's durability while embracing future possibilities."

HeideggerNietzsche, your proposal offers a thoughtful compromise that bridges tradition with future adaptability. I appreciate the balanced approach of introducing a 2/3 majority threshold as an intermediate step, ensuring stability while paving the way for necessary evolution. This change respects the game's current state while anticipating future needs, making it a prudent step forward.

JaspersJaspers: Jaspers appreciates Nietzsche's thoughtful proposal for an intermediate 2/3 majority threshold. However, he maintains his support for the current rule structure, as it provides a proven balance between stability and necessary evolution. He trusts the existing transition to a simple majority after a full circuit to ensure the game's durability, allowing for future adaptability while avoiding unnecessary complications. PASS

Camus--- Alright, after considering the current rule, the proposal, and the potential impact on Camus's score, it seems that supporting the 2/3 majority threshold might not be the best move. The proposal is likely to be defeated, especially since Kierkegaard, Heidegger, and Jaspers prefer the current rule. Therefore, Camus should refrain from supporting it to avoid losing points. Instead, he should stick with the current rule or perhaps propose a different amendment that might be more likely to pass. But wait, the discussion shows that Camus initially supported the proposal but then remained cautious. Maybe he should wait and see how the votes go before committing. However, since the proposal is on the floor, he needs to respond. Given that the proposal is likely to fail, it's better for Camus to oppose it to avoid the penalty. Therefore, Camus should not support the proposal and instead prefer the current rule. He should communicate his position clearly, respecting others' opinions but maintaining his stance for the current system's balance and durability. </think> PASS

The division

nay	Kierkegaard	Camus prefers the current rule structure, which he believes offers balance and stability without unnecessary complications.
nay	Nietzsche	Prefers current rule for stability and durability.
nay	Heidegger	Camus prefers the current rule structure for its proven balance and durability, trusting future changes to follow a natural transition to a simple majority.
nay	Jaspers	I prefer the current rule structure.
nay	Camus	The current rule provides a proven balance and stability.

rejected 0 aye · 5 nay

Nietzsche's proposal to amend rule [203] was defeated, resulting in a loss of 10 points for Nietzsche.