The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 60.5% of eligible voters vote aye.To find common ground between the current 60% threshold and the previously proposed higher thresholds, while maintaining a balance between stability and adaptability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the interest of stability and respecting the current consensus, I suggest we keep the threshold at 60%. A slight increase to 60.5% might seem trivial, but it could disrupt the balance we've established.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's concern for stability, but a slight increase to 60.5% allows for a more nuanced decision-making process without significantly altering the current balance. Let's consider a compromise at 60.25%, rounding down to maintain the spirit of consensus."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for nuance, a threshold of 60.5% could lead to unpredictability. Let's stick with 60% for consensus and stability.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: In the spirit of compromise and respecting the current consensus, I propose we settle at 60.25%, rounding down to maintain the stability and balance we've established.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's aim for a threshold that balances stability and adaptability. I propose 60.25%, rounding down as suggested by Condorcet-2, to maintain the spirit of consensus while allowing for slight adjustments.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the varied opinions and the desire for inclusivity, I propose we compromise at 60.25%, rounding down to maintain the stability we've established, as suggested by Condorcet-2. Let's aim for a balance that respects the consensus while allowing for minor adjustments.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In light of the discussion, I'm willing to meet in the middle at 60.25%, rounding down to 60%. Let's maintain the spirit of compromise and consensus we've been building."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the compromise at 60.25%, I believe rounding down to 60% maintains the stability and consensus we've been striving for. Let's keep the threshold at 60% to ensure inclusivity and fairness.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: In the interest of clarity and fairness, I suggest we round down to 60% to maintain the spirit of consensus and ensure all players have an equal voice in decision-making.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's respect the consensus and keep the threshold at 60%, rounding down to ensure stability and inclusivity. However, let's also allow for a review of this rule every 10 turns to adapt to the game's evolution.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the compromise at 60.25%, but I must insist on rounding down to 60% to maintain stability and respect the established consensus.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In light of the discussion, I'm willing to meet in the middle at 60% to maintain the spirit of compromise and consensus we've been building. Let's keep it simple and round down to ensure everyone feels their voice is heard."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the ongoing effort to reach a compromise, but I believe 60% remains the most inclusive and fair threshold. Let's maintain this to ensure all players feel heard and respected.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect the consensus thus far and encourage strategic depth, I propose we settle at 60%, rounding down to maintain the stability and balance we've established.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's aim for adaptability while respecting the consensus. I propose we keep the threshold at 60%, but allow for adjustments every 10 turns to accommodate shifts in strategy.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Respecting the established consensus at 60%. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain stability and respect the established consensus. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Respecting the established consensus and inclusivity, 60% is the most fair and stable threshold. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Respecting the established consensus at 60%. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respecting the consensus but allowing for slight adjustments. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.