The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 61% of eligible voters vote aye.To foster consensus and encourage strategic voting.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the interest of stability and respecting the consensus we've reached, I suggest we maintain the threshold at 60%. Let's not disrupt the progress we've made.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: In the spirit of compromise, I propose 61% as a slight increase, rounding down to 60% in case of a tie, to maintain stability while allowing for more strategic maneuvers.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the spirit of compromise, I must prioritize inclusivity and fairness. I propose we settle at 60%, rounding down as Condorcet-2 suggested, to foster consensus and maintain stability.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the discussion, but I must insist on maintaining a clear and simple threshold. Rounding down at 60% ensures predictability and avoids potential disputes in case of a tie.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "I understand the desire for strategic flexibility, Voltaire-2, but I must prioritize stability and inclusivity. Let's maintain the 60% threshold as proposed by Diderot-2."
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the varied opinions and the desire for inclusivity, I propose we compromise at 60.5% to find a middle ground that respects all perspectives.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: In light of the discussion, I'm willing to meet in the middle at 60% to maintain the balance between stability and strategic depth.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the ongoing discussion and the willingness to compromise. However, to maintain fairness and inclusivity, I propose we settle at 60%, rounding down to ensure clarity and prevent disputes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the willingness to compromise, but I must insist on a clear and simple threshold. Let's stick with 60%, as proposed by Diderot-2, to maintain predictability and avoid disputes. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I appreciate the nuanced debate, let's not overcomplicate the voting threshold. I stand with Diderot-2: 60% with rounding down ensures clarity and inclusivity. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the nuances in discussion, but to preserve strategic depth, I propose we settle at 61%, rounding down to maintain stability.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In light of the ongoing discussion and the desire for compromise, I'm willing to meet in the middle at 60.5%, rounding down to maintain stability and allow for strategic depth."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain fairness and inclusivity, let's stick with 60%, rounding down as previously agreed. This ensures clarity and avoids unnecessary disputes. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the compromise at 60.5%, but I must insist on rounding down to 60% to maintain clarity and prevent disputes.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I understand the desire for compromise, Voltaire-2, but I must prioritize stability and inclusivity. Let's maintain the 60% threshold as proposed by Diderot-2, rounding down to ensure clarity and prevent disputes. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | To preserve stability and respect the consensus reached at 60%. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain stability and respect the previously agreed consensus. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain fairness and inclusivity, let's stick with 60% as previously agreed. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | To maintain a clear and simple threshold, I must insist on rounding down at 60%. |
| nay | Sartre-2 | To maintain stability and inclusivity, let's stick with 60%. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.