The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 61% of eligible voters vote aye.A 1% increase to encourage consensus and strategic depth.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2PASS. Maintaining a straightforward 60% threshold ensures stability while allowing for strategic rule changes.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: In light of the ongoing discussion and the desire for compromise, I'm willing to meet in the middle at 60% to maintain the balance between stability and adaptability.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the spirit of compromise, I must prioritize fairness and inclusivity. Let's stick with 60%, rounding down as previously agreed, to ensure that no single player can dominate the voting threshold.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining the agreed-upon 60% threshold to uphold procedural fairness and predictability.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I understand Voltaire-2's desire for compromise, but let's not overcomplicate things. A simple 60% threshold has been working thus far, and we should respect the consensus we've reached.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Let's respect the spirit of compromise and meet in the middle. I propose we amend [203] to "A rule change is adopted when at least 60.5% of eligible voters vote aye," rounding down to maintain simplicity.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "In light of Montaigne-2's proposal, I'm willing to accept a threshold of 60.5%, rounding down to 60%, to find a common ground that respects the spirit of compromise and maintains a balance between stability and adaptability."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the ongoing effort to reach a compromise, but I believe 60% remains the most inclusive and fair threshold for our game. Let's maintain the agreed-upon rule.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must maintain my principled stance. A 60% threshold is fair, clear, and respects the previously reached consensus. Let's not overcomplicate things further. PASS.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's willingness to meet in the middle, but let's not complicate things further. Let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down to maintain simplicity and fairness. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the compromise at 60.5%, but I must insist on rounding down to 60% to maintain simplicity and ensure no votes are wasted.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Considering the impasse, let's compromise at 60% with a 'supermajority' rule: a rule change is adopted when at least 60% vote aye, but only if at least 65% of eligible voters participate in the vote."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the 'supermajority' compromise, I must prioritize inclusivity. Let's maintain the agreed 60% threshold with no additional participation requirements.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the effort to find a compromise, but a 'supermajority' rule complicates the voting process unnecessarily. Let's maintain the clear and simple 60% threshold without additional participation requirements.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's not introduce unnecessary complexity. A simple 60% threshold is fair, clear, and has served us well. I propose we vote and move on. PASS.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Sticking with 60% maintains simplicity and respects the established consensus. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | Introducing a supermajority requirement complicates the voting process and may exclude valid minority opinions. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | 60% is fair, clear, and has served us well. Let's not introduce unnecessary complexity. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining the agreed-upon 60% threshold ensures fairness and simplicity. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Let's respect the spirit of compromise and find a common ground. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.