Turn 2 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §203

A rule change is adopted only when at least 75% of eligible voters vote aye. Once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.

To maintain strategic depth while ensuring eventual progress

The floor

Discussion · round 1

Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the spirit of compromise, but I must insist on keeping the threshold at unanimous consent for the first two circuits to ensure a solid foundation of agreement as we begin.

Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's concern, but consider this: a 75% threshold allows for more flexibility in early game rule changes while still maintaining a significant level of consensus. Let us compromise for the greater good of the game."

Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: I appreciate both of your perspectives. To balance consensus and flexibility, let's meet in the middle at 80% for the first two circuits, dropping to a simple majority thereafter.

Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the sentiment of compromise, but I must insist on maintaining unanimous consent throughout the game to ensure procedural fairness.

Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let us embrace experimentation and evolution. I propose we adopt Voltaire-2's amendment with a slight modification: make the initial threshold 66%, reflecting a supermajority while still allowing for some flexibility in early game rule changes. After two full circuits, the threshold drops to a simple majority. This way, we encourage rule evolution while maintaining a substantial level of consensus.

Discussion · round 2

Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: While I appreciate the spirit of evolution, I must advocate for maintaining a higher threshold of 80% for the first two circuits to preserve initial stability and consensus, as proposed by Diderot-2. After that, we can adapt to a simple majority. Let us find a balance between flexibility and stability.

Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I propose we meet in the middle, adopting Diderot-2's suggestion of 80% for the first two circuits, then dropping to a simple majority. This respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary evolution.

Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the willingness to compromise, but let's not overlook the importance of stability in the early game. I propose we keep the initial threshold at 80% for the first two circuits, then drop to a simple majority, as suggested by Diderot-2 and supported by Montaigne-2. This balance respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary evolution. PASS

Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand the desire for flexibility, I must maintain my principle of unanimous consent throughout the game. I propose an alternative: keep the threshold at 80% for the first three circuits, then drop to 66%, and finally to a simple majority. This gradual shift balances consensus and evolution. PASS

Sartre-2Sartre-2: Let's find common ground. I propose we adopt Diderot-2's initial threshold of 80% for the first two circuits, then drop to 66% for the next two circuits, and finally to a simple majority. This gradual evolution respects initial consensus while encouraging experimentation and growth. PASS

Discussion · round 3

Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the nuanced compromises proposed, but I insist on maintaining a higher initial threshold of 90% for the first three circuits to ensure a robust foundation of agreement. After that, we can gradually reduce to 66% and finally to a simple majority, as suggested by Sartre-2. This gradual evolution respects initial consensus while allowing for necessary change. PASS

Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate the varying perspectives and compromises made. To find common ground, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's initial threshold of 80% for the first two circuits, then gradually reduce to 66% for the next two circuits, and finally to a simple majority. This gradual evolution respects initial consensus while encouraging experimentation and growth. PASS

Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate the discussions. To find a balanced solution that respects initial consensus and allows for necessary evolution, let's adopt Sartre-2's proposal with a slight modification: 80% for the first two circuits, 70% for the next two circuits, and then a simple majority. This gradual shift maintains a substantial level of agreement while encouraging experimentation. PASS

Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the gradual shift proposed, I must insist on maintaining unanimous consent throughout the game to ensure procedural fairness. I propose an alternative: keep the threshold at 90% for the first four circuits, then drop to 75%, and finally to a simple majority. This gradual shift balances consensus and evolution while adhering to my procedural principles.

Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Condorcet-2's commitment to unanimous consent, but let's meet in the middle to encourage evolution. I propose we adopt 85% for the first three circuits, 70% for the next two, and then a simple majority. This gradual shift respects initial consensus while promoting experimentation. PASS

The division

aye	Montaigne-2	Gradual evolution while respecting initial consensus
aye	Voltaire-2	Voltaire-2 supports gradual evolution while respecting initial consensus.
aye	Diderot-2	This proposal balances initial consensus with necessary evolution, promoting a fair and engaging game for all.
nay	Condorcet-2	Unanimous consent must be maintained throughout the game for procedural fairness.
aye	Sartre-2	Encourages evolution while respecting initial consensus.

rejected 4 aye · 1 nay

Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.