The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 59% of eligible voters vote 'aye', rounded down. If a player votes against an adopted change, they gain 5 points.To encourage strategic voting and respect the ongoing debate.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's latest proposal, but to preserve stability and encourage broad consensus, let's maintain the 60% threshold.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I understand Montaigne-2's concern, lowering the threshold to 59% encourages more strategic voting and compromise, which benefits everyone in the long run.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain fairness and inclusivity, let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down, as previously discussed.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the ongoing discussion, but to respect the principle of majority rule, let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down. Lowering the threshold risks instability and could lead to constant rule changes.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we meet in the middle at 59.75%, rounded down, to balance stability and strategic engagement.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's proposal, but to maintain predictability and respect the ongoing consensus, let's meet in the middle at 59.5%, rounded down.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "To find common ground, let's settle at 59.5%, rounded down, as suggested by Montaigne-2. This maintains a balance between stability and strategic engagement."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the ongoing effort to find common ground, I must prioritize inclusivity and fairness. Let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down, to ensure all voices are heard and respected.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Condorcet-2: To maintain fairness and respect all viewpoints, let's compromise at 59.5%, rounding down, as suggested by Montaigne-2.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: Considering the varied opinions, I propose we settle at 59.5%, rounding down, with a voluntary 5-point bonus for voting 'aye' to encourage strategic engagement.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's addition of a bonus, but to maintain simplicity and avoid potential gaming, let's stick with a 59.5% threshold without bonuses or penalties.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Given the impasse, let's compromise at 59.5%, rounded down, with no bonuses or penalties. This respects all viewpoints and encourages strategic voting."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 60% threshold to ensure all voices have equal weight. Let's prioritize inclusivity and fairness over potential strategic advantages.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Condorcet-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's commitment to inclusivity and fairness. To balance this with the desire for strategic engagement, let's meet in the middle at 59.75%, rounded down. This maintains respect for the majority while encouraging strategic voting.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: Considering the impasse, let's compromise at 59.5%, rounded down, with a voluntary 3-point bonus for voting 'aye' to encourage strategic engagement while respecting inclusivity.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | To maintain stability and encourage broad consensus. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain inclusivity and fairness, let's stick with the agreed 60%. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain fairness and inclusivity, let's stick with the agreed 60% threshold. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | To maintain stability and respect the ongoing consensus, let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounded down. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | To encourage strategic engagement and respect the ongoing debate. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.