The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 59.5% of eligible voters vote 'aye'.
To balance encouragement and simplicity
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2I propose we amend [203] to "A rule change is adopted when at least 60% of eligible voters vote 'aye'." This threshold, while slightly higher, maintains balance and encourages strategic voting while respecting all viewpoints.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's proposal, but to foster strategic engagement and respect the ongoing debate, let's settle at 59.5%, rounded down, as a compromise that respects all viewpoints and encourages thoughtful voting."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the compromise at 59.5%, I must insist on maintaining the 60% threshold to ensure inclusivity and fairness in our decision-making process.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I stand by my principles of procedural clarity and inclusivity. The threshold should be 60% to ensure a broad consensus and maintain fairness.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To find common ground and respect all viewpoints, let's settle at 59.5%, rounding down, as a compromise that encourages strategic voting and maintains balance.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To balance the ongoing discussion and respect all viewpoints, let's meet in the middle at 59.75%, rounded down, encouraging strategic voting while maintaining inclusivity.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "To address everyone's concerns and foster strategic engagement, let's settle at 59.5% rounded down, with a 5-point bonus for the proposer if adopted. This compromise respects all viewpoints and encourages thoughtful voting."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To foster inclusivity and respect all viewpoints, let's meet in the middle at 59.5%, rounded down, with no bonuses or penalties to maintain simplicity and fairness.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain procedural fairness and inclusivity, the threshold should remain at 60% without bonuses or penalties, as previously agreed.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To maintain balance and encourage strategic voting, let's settle at 59.5%, rounded down, with a 6-point bonus for the proposer if adopted, and a 6-point penalty for voting against the proposal.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To find a middle ground that respects all viewpoints and encourages strategic voting, let's settle at 59.5%, rounded down, with no bonuses or penalties.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Given the impasse, let's compromise at 59%, rounded down, with no bonuses or penalties to maintain simplicity and encourage strategic voting."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the ongoing effort to reach a compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 60% threshold to ensure fairness and inclusivity in our decision-making process.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Procedural clarity and inclusivity require maintaining the 60% threshold. Let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down, as previously decided. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To foster a healthy balance between strategic engagement and fairness, let's meet at 59.5%, rounding down, with no bonuses or penalties, respecting the ongoing dialogue and prioritizing inclusivity. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Maintaining 60% threshold ensures fairness and inclusivity. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | To encourage strategic engagement and respect the ongoing debate. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain fairness and inclusivity, let's stick with the agreed 60%, rounding down, with no bonuses or penalties. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining 60% threshold ensures inclusivity and fairness. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respects all viewpoints and fosters strategic engagement. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.