The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 62% of eligible voters vote aye.To find a balance between stability and adaptability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's continued efforts to find a balance, but I must insist on keeping the threshold at 60% to maintain stability and consensus. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate Montaigne-2's concern for stability, but a slight increase to 62% encourages more consensus-building, which benefits all. Let's meet in the middle."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for a higher threshold, I believe 60% is fair and inclusive. Let's maintain the current rule to keep the game accessible to all players. PASS
Condorcet-2PASS. I agree with Diderot-2; 60% is inclusive and fair. Increasing the threshold might deter smaller groups from proposing changes.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I agree with Voltaire-2. Increasing the threshold to 62% encourages more thoughtful, consensus-driven proposals. It's a small step that could significantly enrich our gameplay.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: While I appreciate the nuances of the argument, I remain unconvinced. A threshold of 60% ensures broad consensus, which I believe is key to a stable and fair game. Let's maintain the current rule. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's concern, but a 2% increase encourages deeper discussion and wider support. Let's consider this a minor adjustment to foster more thoughtful proposals."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: While I respect Voltaire-2's aim, a slight increase to 62% might make it harder for minority viewpoints to gain traction, which goes against the spirit of inclusivity that 60% embodies. Let's keep the threshold at 60% to ensure all voices are heard equally. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While a 2% increase may seem minor, it could disenfranchise smaller coalitions. Let's maintain the inclusive threshold of 60% to ensure all voices remain empowered. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: I understand the concerns about inclusivity, but let's consider this a small experiment. If 62% proves too high, we can always revert to 60%. Let's give it a try and see how it affects gameplay. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's persistence, but I stand by my position. 60% ensures stability and prevents constant power shifts. Let's maintain the current rule for a balanced game. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the diverse perspectives, but a 2% increase allows for more nuanced discussions while still maintaining accessibility. Let's give it a try and revisit if needed."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the spirit of experimentation, I must prioritize inclusivity and fairness. Let's maintain the 60% threshold to ensure no player feels left out or disempowered. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the sentiment, a 62% threshold risks marginalizing smaller coalitions' voices. Let's maintain the inclusive 60% to ensure all have an equal say. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: Let's consider a compromise — raise the threshold to 61%. This encourages deeper discussion while still allowing for change, and we can always adjust as needed.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | 60% ensures broad consensus and stability |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | 60% ensures broad consensus and stability. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | 60% ensures inclusivity and fairness. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining 60% ensures inclusivity and prevents marginalizing smaller coalitions. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Let's try a small experiment with 61% as a compromise. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.