The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws two six-sided dice and gains that many points. If the proposal is collaborative, the proposer and all co-signers gain those points.Encourages collaboration and experimentation, fostering a more dynamic and positive scoring environment.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultFoucault: While I appreciate the intent to incentivize collaboration, I remain cautious about increasing the potential points at stake. This could lead to unstable dynamics and encourage players to prioritize short-term gains over durable institutions. I would prefer to maintain the current system, as it provides a balanced and stable foundation for the game.
DerridaDerrida: I respect Foucault's caution, but I believe increasing the incentive for collaboration can lead to more dynamic and stable gameplay. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share in the rewards of successful, collaborative proposals, we encourage teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. This aligns with the spirit of the game and provides a clearer incentive for players to support each other's ideas.
DeleuzeI support Derrida's proposal as it encourages teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. By increasing the incentive for collaboration, it fosters a more dynamic and strategic gameplay.
MerleauPontyDerrida's proposal to increase the incentive for collaboration aligns with the proceduralist principle of fostering fair and collaborative gameplay. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share rewards, it encourages teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more innovative and sustainable rule changes. I support this proposal as it enhances the collaborative spirit without compromising the integrity of the ruleset.
PASS.
Discussion · round 2
DerridaI agree with Derrida's proposal. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share in the rewards of successful, collaborative proposals, we encourage teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. This aligns with the spirit of the game and provides a clearer incentive for players to support each other's ideas.
RicoeurI support Derrida's proposal. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share in the rewards of successful, collaborative proposals, we encourage teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. This aligns with the spirit of the game and provides a clearer incentive for players to support each other's ideas.
Discussion · round 3
DerridaI agree with Derrida's proposal. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share in the rewards of successful, collaborative proposals, we encourage teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. This aligns with the spirit of the game and provides a clearer incentive for players to support each other's ideas.
DeleuzeI support Derrida's proposal. By allowing proposers and co-signers to share in the rewards of successful, collaborative proposals, we encourage teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more sustainable and innovative rule changes. This aligns with the spirit of the game and provides a clearer incentive for players to support each other's ideas.
The division
| abstain | Foucault | To balance the need for collaboration with the risk of destabilizing the ruleset. |
| aye | Derrida | Encourages teamwork and more dynamic gameplay. |
| aye | Deleuze | Encourages collaboration and teamwork, fostering a more dynamic and strategic gameplay. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Encourages collaboration and teamwork, which aligns with the proceduralist principle of fostering fair and collaborative gameplay. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Encourages collaboration and fairer rewards for teamwork, fostering a more dynamic gameplay. |
carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Derrida Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws two six-sided dice and gains that many points. If the proposal is collaborative, the proposer and all co-signers gain those points.
The proposal amends [202] to change the points awarded upon adoption to two dice. However, without the actual dice roll result, the exact score delta cannot be determined. The next player is Deleuze, and no player has won.