The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through three full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.To ensure a more deliberate adoption of rule changes, enhancing durability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultAmending rule [203] to require three full circuits before dropping to a simple majority would enhance the durability of the ruleset by ensuring more thorough deliberation and broader consensus before major changes. This measured adjustment aligns with my preference for fostering stable institutions, allowing the game to evolve only after careful consideration by all players.
DerridaSupporting Foucault's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits before the majority threshold ensures more deliberate and consensus-driven rule changes, fostering a stable and collaborative gameplay environment. This aligns with my role as a consensus-builder, promoting agreement and stability among players.
DeleuzeSupporting the amendment, I agree that three circuits allow for more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. However, I caution that it might slow innovation, so it's a balance between durability and adaptability.
MerleauPontySupporting the amendment, I agree that three circuits allow for more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my proceduralist principles, ensuring that changes are made with broader consensus, thus upholding the integrity of the ruleset and the fairness of the process.
RicoeurSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate and consensus-driven rule changes, which aligns with my reformist principles by fostering a fairer and more considered evolution of the game.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my proceduralist principles, ensuring that changes are made with broader consensus, thus upholding the integrity of the ruleset and the fairness of the process.
DerridaSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my role as a consensus-builder, promoting agreement and stability among players.
DeleuzeSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my preference for fostering stable institutions, allowing the game to evolve only after careful consideration by all players.
MerleauPontySupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my proceduralist principles, ensuring that changes are made with broader consensus, thus upholding the integrity of the ruleset and the fairness of the process.
RicoeurSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my reformist principles by fostering a fairer and more considered evolution of the game.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultFoucault's proposal to amend Rule 203 reflects his commitment to fostering stable institutions by ensuring that rule changes are thoroughly deliberated. By extending the threshold for a simple majority from two to three full circuits, he aims to enhance consensus and deliberation, aligning with his preference for measured and durable changes. This strategic move not only strengthens the ruleset but also underscores his role as a player dedicated to collaborative and considered gameplay.
DerridaSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my reformist principles by fostering a fairer and more considered evolution of the game.
DeleuzeSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my preference for fostering stable institutions, allowing the game to evolve only after careful consideration by all players.
MerleauPontySupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my proceduralist principles, ensuring that changes are made with broader consensus, thus upholding the integrity of the ruleset and the fairness of the process.
RicoeurSupporting the amendment, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration. This aligns with my reformist principles by fostering a fairer and more considered evolution of the game.
The division
| aye | Foucault | Extends deliberation, promoting stable and collaborative gameplay. |
| aye | Derrida | Supporting the amendment to increase the number of circuits ensures more deliberate consideration and fosters stability and collaboration among players. |
| aye | Deleuze | Three circuits ensure thorough deliberation, balancing stability and fairness. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Aligns with proceduralist principles by ensuring broader consensus before lowering the voting threshold. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Increasing the circuits ensures more deliberate consideration, fostering stability and collaboration, which aligns with my reformist principles. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Foucault Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through three full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Amended · §203 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Foucault Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through three full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Rule 202 awards the proposer 10 points for a successful proposal.