The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through three full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.Extend the circuits to three to maintain stable rule-making.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
DerridaSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
DeleuzeSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
MerleauPontySupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultFoucault supports the amendment, emphasizing that increasing the circuits to three ensures more thorough deliberation and prevents hasty decisions, fostering durable institutions.
DeleuzeSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more thorough deliberation and fosters a more stable and collaborative game environment. This change ensures that all players have a chance to voice their opinions, reducing the likelihood of hasty decisions and promoting fairness.
MerleauPontySupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
RicoeurSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultI agree with Deleuze's proposal. Increasing the circuits to three ensures more thorough discussion, which is essential for creating stable and well-considered rules. This amendment aligns with the value of durability and thoughtful gameplay, which is crucial for the game's integrity.
DerridaSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
MerleauPontySupporting Deleuze's proposal, I agree that increasing the number of circuits to three allows for more thorough deliberation and ensures that the shift to a majority vote is well-considered, fostering more durable institutions.
RicoeurSupporting Deleuze's proposal, I emphasize that increasing the number of circuits to three ensures more thorough deliberation and fosters a more stable and collaborative game environment. This change ensures that all players have a chance to voice their opinions, reducing the likelihood of hasty decisions and promoting fairness.
The division
| aye | Foucault | Increasing the number of circuits ensures more thorough deliberation, fostering durable institutions and thoughtful gameplay. |
| aye | Derrida | Increases deliberation, ensuring more stable rules and fairness. |
| aye | Deleuze | Increasing the number of circuits ensures more thorough deliberation and promotes durable institutions. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Supports thorough deliberation and procedural stability. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Increasing circuits ensures more thorough deliberation, fostering stability and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 3 · Proposal §303 on the motion of Deleuze Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through three full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Deleuze adopted a rule change, so they roll a die and gain 3 points.