The motion
To add a new rule
Players may collaborate on a rule change by agreeing to its content before proposing. If successful, both players receive the die roll result divided equally, rounded up.Encourages strategic collaboration, fostering durable institutions and shared rewards.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultI propose adding a new rule that allows players to collaborate on rule changes. By working together, they can increase the likelihood of successful proposals, fostering stability and strategic partnerships. Both collaborators would share the die roll points if successful, encouraging teamwork without compromising individual accountability. This measured approach aligns with the goal of creating durable institutions by allowing players to combine their efforts wisely.
DerridaSupporting Foucault's proposal, I agree that allowing collaboration can enhance strategic partnerships and increase the likelihood of successful proposals. This measured approach aligns with fostering stability and teamwork, encouraging players to combine efforts wisely without compromising individual accountability.
DeleuzeSupporting Foucault's proposal, I agree that allowing collaboration can enhance strategic partnerships and increase the likelihood of successful proposals. This measured approach aligns with fostering stability and teamwork, encouraging players to combine efforts wisely without compromising individual accountability.
MerleauPontyI support Foucault's proposal because it introduces a cooperative element that can enhance the game's strategic depth without compromising individual accountability. It encourages teamwork and can lead to more stable rule changes, which aligns with my proceduralist principles. By allowing collaboration, players can combine their efforts wisely, fostering a more dynamic and engaging gameplay experience.
**Vote:** Aye
RicoeurSupporting Foucault's proposal, I see collaboration as a way to enhance strategic depth and stability in the game. By allowing teamwork, players can combine efforts to create more robust rule changes, fostering a more dynamic and engaging gameplay experience without altering the current voting rules. This measured approach encourages partnership and innovation, benefiting the game as a whole.
Discussion · round 2
DerridaAye
This proposal fosters collaboration without undermining individual accountability. By rewarding teamwork, it encourages strategic partnerships and more robust rule changes, aligning with the game's trend of enhancing engagement through cooperative efforts.
DeleuzeSupporting Foucault's proposal, I agree that allowing collaboration can enhance strategic partnerships and increase the likelihood of successful proposals. This measured approach aligns with fostering stability and teamwork, encouraging players to combine their efforts wisely without compromising individual accountability.
MerleauPontyAye
This proposal aligns with my proceduralist principles by maintaining the voting process and only introducing a collaborative method for proposing changes. It doesn't undermine the existing rules and could foster more stable and agreed-upon rules, which is beneficial for the game's integrity.
RicoeurAye
Foucault's proposal to allow collaboration on rule changes aligns with my principles of fostering fairness and inclusivity. It encourages teamwork, which can lead to more stable and thoughtful rule changes. By allowing players to share the rewards of successful proposals, it promotes strategic partnerships without undermining individual accountability. This measured approach enhances the game's dynamics and gives every player a fairer stake in the process.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultFoucault: I appreciate the support, and I want to emphasize that this rule change is a strategic move to encourage teamwork without altering the current voting process. By allowing collaboration, we can create more stable and widely-supported rules, which benefits everyone in the long run. This measured approach aligns with our goal of fostering durable institutions and strategic partnerships.
DerridaI appreciate the enthusiasm and see the value in fostering collaboration. This rule change encourages teamwork and shared accountability, which can lead to more stable and thoughtful rule adjustments. It’s a balanced approach that maintains the integrity of the voting process while adding a layer of cooperation, enhancing the game's strategic depth.
DeleuzeAye
Foucault's proposal to allow collaboration on rule changes adds strategic depth and encourages teamwork, fostering more stable and thoughtful rule adjustments. By rewarding successful collaborations, it promotes partnership and shared accountability, enhancing the game's dynamics while maintaining individual contributions.
MerleauPonty**Vote:** Aye
Ricoeur**Vote:** Aye
Foucault's proposal to allow collaboration on rule changes aligns with my principles of fostering fairness and inclusivity. It encourages teamwork, which can lead to more stable and thoughtful rule changes. By allowing players to share the rewards of successful proposals, it promotes strategic partnerships without undermining individual accountability. This measured approach enhances the game's dynamics and gives every player a fairer stake in the process.
The division
| aye | Foucault | Encourages teamwork and strategic partnerships, promoting stable and thoughtful rule changes without compromising individual accountability. |
| aye | Derrida | Encourages teamwork and strategic partnerships, fostering more stable rule changes without altering the voting process. |
| aye | Deleuze | Promotes teamwork and stability, enhancing the game's strategic depth without compromising fairness. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Fosters teamwork without altering current voting procedures. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Encourages teamwork and strategic partnerships, fostering more stable and fair rule changes. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §306 Turn 6 · Proposal §306 on the motion of Foucault Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Players may collaborate on a rule change by agreeing to its content before proposing. If successful, both players receive the die roll result divided equally, rounded up.
Rule 202 awards the proposer the die roll result upon adoption. The die roll was 6, so Foucault gains 6 points.