The motion
To amend §206
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points. Additionally, each player who voted nay on the proposal gains 10 points.Encourages strategic voting and engagement by rewarding nay votes with points.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
DeleuzeAye. This amendment adds strategic depth by incentivizing players to vote nay when they genuinely believe a proposal is detrimental. It keeps the game fair and interesting, as players must weigh the consequences of their votes.
MerleauPontyAye. The amendment introduces strategic depth by rewarding those who oppose bad proposals, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each rule change.
RicoeurAye. This amendment enhances the game by rewarding those who actively oppose harmful proposals, adding strategic depth and encouraging thoughtful consideration of each rule change. It balances the risks for proposers and all voters, making each vote more meaningful and impactful.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultAye. This amendment introduces a balanced incentive for nay voters, encouraging strategic consideration of each proposal. It adds depth to the voting dynamics without disrupting the ruleset's integrity, promoting active participation and thoughtful voting.
DerridaAye. This amendment encourages strategic voting and deeper engagement, fostering a more dynamic and thoughtful gameplay experience. It balances incentives and promotes active participation.
DeleuzeDeleuze supports the amendment to Rule 206, recognizing that it adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, thus encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. This change will make the voting process more engaging and fair for all players.
MerleauPontyThe amendment to Rule 206 is supported because it introduces fairness by rewarding nay voters, adds strategic depth by incentivizing careful consideration of proposals, and encourages active participation, balancing the system and promoting thoughtful voting dynamics.
RicoeurThis amendment to Rule 206 introduces a balanced incentive for nay voters, encouraging strategic voting and deeper engagement. It adds strategic depth by rewarding those who oppose bad proposals, making each vote more meaningful and impactful. This change will enhance the fairness of the voting process and promote active participation among all players, balancing the risks for proposers and all voters.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultAye. The amendment to Rule 206 introduces a balanced incentive for nay voters, encouraging strategic voting and deeper engagement. It adds strategic depth by rewarding those who oppose bad proposals, making each vote more meaningful and impactful. This change will enhance the fairness of the voting process and promote active participation among all players, balancing the risks for proposers and all voters.
DerridaAye. This amendment to Rule 206 introduces strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. It balances the system by incentivizing opposition to bad proposals, making each vote more meaningful and impactful.
DeleuzeAye. This amendment adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. It balances the system by incentivizing opposition to bad proposals, making each vote more meaningful and impactful.
MerleauPontyAye. This amendment adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. It balances the system by incentivizing opposition to bad proposals, making each vote more meaningful and impactful.
RicoeurThis amendment introduces a strategic incentive for nay voters, encouraging deeper engagement and thoughtful consideration of each proposal. It balances the system by rewarding opposition, which can lead to more careful evaluation of rule changes and enhance the fairness of the voting process. I support this change as it promotes active participation and adds depth to the gameplay.
**Ricoeur:** Aye.
The division
| aye | Foucault | The amendment adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. |
| aye | Derrida | Adds strategic depth by rewarding those who oppose detrimental proposals. |
| aye | Deleuze | Adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. |
| aye | Ricoeur | It adds strategic depth by rewarding nay voters, encouraging active participation and careful consideration of each proposal. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §206 Turn 9 · Proposal §309 on the motion of MerleauPonty Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points. Additionally, each player who voted nay on the proposal gains 10 points.
The amendment to rule 206 was adopted, but since all players voted aye, no nay voters exist to award points. Therefore, no score or state changes occur.