The motion
To add a new rule
Rule 340: Players may propose to adjust the target score by 5% during their turn, with the adjustment applied immediately after their proposal completes.A clear and simple mechanism for targeted score adjustments while maintaining balance and strategy.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
NagarjunaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it offers a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility without compromising game depth.
Shankara**Shankara** proposes adding Rule 340: "Players may propose to adjust the target score by 5% during their turn, with the adjustment applied immediately after their proposal completes."
RamanujaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it provides a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility without compromising game depth.
VasubandhuI support the addition of Rule 340 as it adds flexibility and balance to the game. However, I think capping the adjustment at 5% would prevent excessive volatility.
DignagaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it offers a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, providing flexibility without compromising game depth.
Discussion · round 2
NagarjunaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it offers a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility and balance without overcomplicating the game.
ShankaraShankara, I support adding a cap to the 5% adjustment in Rule 340 to make it ±5% during a player's turn. This would add consistency while maintaining flexibility.
RamanujaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it offers controlled adjustments, preventing excessive volatility while maintaining flexibility. However, I suggest capping the adjustment at 5% in either direction to maintain balance.
VasubandhuI support the addition of Rule 340 as it offers a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility while maintaining game depth. The 5% cap prevents excessive volatility and aligns with the strategic adjustments players have been discussing.
DignagaI support adding Rule 340 as it offers a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility and strategic depth without overcomplicating the game. The 5% cap prevents excessive volatility, aligning with the discussions we've had about fine-tuning the target score.
Discussion · round 3
NagarjunaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it provides a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility without compromising game depth.
ShankaraShankara, I propose adding a rule that allows players to adjust the target score by a maximum of 5% during their turn, capping the adjustment at ±5%. This provides a controlled way to influence the game without excessive volatility, aligning with the discussions about fine-tuning the target score.
RamanujaI support the addition of Rule 340 as it provides a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility without compromising game depth.
VasubandhuI support the addition of Rule 340 as it provides a controlled and balanced way to adjust the target score, enhancing flexibility without compromising game depth. However, I think capping the adjustment at 5% would prevent excessive volatility.
DignagaI support the addition of Rule 340 with the suggestion of a 5% adjustment cap during a player's turn. This balanced approach prevents excessive volatility while allowing players to influence the game meaningfully.
The division
| aye | Nagarjuna | Supporting Rule 340 maintains game balance and prevents excessive volatility by limiting target score adjustments to 5%. |
| aye | Shankara | Support for Rule 340 as it offers controlled adjustments without causing volatility, aligning with discussions on fine-tuning the target score. |
| nay | Ramanuja | A 5% adjustment from 18 leads to fractional scores and minimal impact, which may disrupt game balance and player experience. |
| aye | Vasubandhu | The 5% adjustment cap provides controlled flexibility and maintains game balance, fitting within existing rule structure and player discussions about fine-tuning the target score. |
| aye | Dignaga | Supports Rule 340 as it offers a controlled 5% adjustment, aligning with strategic discussions and balancing volatility. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §311 Turn 42 · Proposal §341 on the motion of Shankara Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
Increase the target score by 10 points
Shankara's proposal was adopted, so they gain points from a six-sided die roll as per rule 202; since the proposal did not name other rules for amendment or repeal, ruleset_ops is empty.