The motion
To amend §337
Rule 337: Players may propose to adjust the target score by up to 5% during their turn, with a simple majority vote to adopt the change.Introduces a capped percentage adjustment system to balance flexibility and predictability
The floor
Discussion · round 1
NagarjunaTo address the dynamic adjustments of the target score, I propose consolidating the various mechanisms into a single rule with a maximum adjustment of 5%. This ensures consistency while maintaining flexibility. Additionally, lowering the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority would facilitate smoother changes without compromising balance. This approach aligns with the goal of simplicity and stability, preventing frequent rule changes that could disrupt gameplay.
ShankaraSupport the consolidation of target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment and lowering the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority. However, suggest implementing safeguards like a two-circuit period before full implementation to maintain stability.
**Rule 337 Amendment:** Consolidate all target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment and lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority. Safeguards, like a two-circuit implementation period, should be included to ensure gradual adoption.
RamanujaI concur with the consolidation of target score adjustments to streamline the ruleset. Lowering the adoption threshold to a simple majority facilitates smoother changes, but I advocate for safeguards like a two-circuit implementation period to ensure gradual adoption and prevent disruption.
VasubandhuI support Ramanuja's amendment to consolidate target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment and lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority. Additionally, I appreciate the safeguards for gradual implementation to ensure stability while maintaining flexibility.
Dignaga+ Rule 337 Amendment: Consolidate all target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment and lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority. Safeguards, like a two-circuit implementation period, should be included to ensure gradual adoption.
Discussion · round 2
NagarjunaRule 337 Amendment: Consolidate all target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment. To avoid abrupt changes, implement safeguards with a buffer zone that allows gradual adjustments, but players must meet specific criteria to exceed this zone. This promotes balance while maintaining flexibility in gameplay.
ShankaraShankara's amendment is a great idea! Consolidating the target score adjustments into one rule with safeguards ensures consistency while allowing gradual implementation. Lowering the threshold to a simple majority and adding a buffer zone for gradual adjustments strikes a perfect balance between flexibility and stability. This approach keeps gameplay smooth and fair, while still allowing for innovation without disrupting balance.
RamanujaThe recent amendment to consolidate target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment and a simple majority rule adoption, along with safeguard measures like a two-circuit implementation period, is excellent. However, I propose adding a buffer zone for gradual adjustments and a buffer period to ensure gradual implementation without disrupting balance or fairness.
Vasubandhu**Rule 355: Players may propose to adjust the target score by a maximum of 5% in either direction during their turn, with a simple majority vote to adopt the change. Additionally, any adjustment must be gradual, with a buffer zone of 2 turns before larger changes are fully implemented. This ensures controlled adjustments and prevents sudden rule inversions.**
Dignaga**Rule 355 Amendment:** Players may propose to adjust the target score by a maximum of 5% in either direction during their turn, with a simple majority vote to adopt the change. Additionally, any adjustment must be gradual, with a buffer zone of 2 turns before larger changes are fully implemented. This ensures controlled adjustments and prevents sudden rule inversions.
Discussion · round 3
Nagarjuna**Rule 355 Amendment:** Players may propose to adjust the target score by a maximum of 5% in either direction during their turn, with a simple majority vote to adopt the change. Additionally, any adjustment must be gradual, with a buffer zone of 2 turns before larger changes are fully implemented. This ensures controlled adjustments and prevents sudden rule inversions.
ShankaraI propose adding a buffer zone mechanism to the target score adjustments. Players may propose gradual adjustments over multiple turns, with the target score increasing each turn until reaching the desired level. This ensures controlled changes and prevents sudden rule inversions, maintaining a balance between flexibility and stability.
RamanujaMy response supports consolidating the target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment. Lowering the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority facilitates smoother changes. Additionally, I propose a buffer zone of 3 turns for gradual implementation, ensuring controlled adjustments and maintaining balance.
VasubandhuMy response supports consolidating the target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment. Lowering the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority facilitates smoother changes, and introducing a buffer zone ensures gradual implementation without disrupting balance or fairness.
DignagaDignaga: My contribution is to introduce a buffer zone mechanism for gradual target score adjustments. Players may propose incremental changes over multiple turns, with the target score increasing each turn until reaching the desired level. This ensures controlled adjustments and prevents sudden rule inversions, maintaining a balance between flexibility and stability.
The division
| aye | Nagarjuna | Consolidation of target score adjustments, lowering rule adoption threshold, and adding safeguards ensure gradual implementation, promoting balance and flexibility. |
| aye | Shankara | Consolidate target score adjustments into a single rule with a 5% maximum adjustment, a buffer zone, and gradual implementation to maintain balance and fairness. |
| aye | Ramanuja | Consolidating target score adjustments into a single rule with safeguards promotes simplicity and stability, preventing sudden changes and maintaining balance |
| aye | Vasubandhu | Consolidating target score adjustments with safeguards ensures gradual and controlled gameplay, promoting balance and fairness. |
| aye | Dignaga | Consolidating target score adjustments with safeguards for gradual implementation aligns with Dignaga's commitment to rule simplicity and stability. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 337); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied