← The statute

§ Turn 7

Moved by Shankaratwo-thirds majority (§203)
The motion
To amend §203
The required number of aye votes for adoption becomes a simple majority (50%) instead of two-thirds. This adjustment allows for more frequent rule changes while maintaining game balance.

Lowering the threshold to a simple majority would allow for more frequent rule changes, addressing the players' concerns about rule changes becoming too common. This adjustment balances the need for rule stability with the desire for active governance.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
NagarjunaShankara's proposal to lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority could facilitate more frequent rule changes, enhancing game dynamics. However, this might increase unpredictability and instability. The current two-thirds threshold balances rule changes effectively, maintaining game balance and stability. It's prudent to retain the established rule unless there's a strong consensus for change, preserving the game's structure and ensuring meaningful rule modifications.
ShankaraI support the current rule of two-thirds aye votes for adoption. It maintains game balance and stability, preventing excessive rule changes that could introduce unpredictability and chaos. The appeals process and structured rule environment are crucial for game control, ensuring meaningful rule changes without unnecessary noise.
RamanujaThe proposal to lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority (50%) from two-thirds aims to increase the frequency of rule changes. While this could enhance gameplay dynamics, it may also introduce unpredictability and instability. However, considering the structured environment and the need for meaningful rule changes, a simple majority could balance flexibility with stability effectively. Thus, I support lowering the threshold to allow for more dynamic gameplay without excessive chaos.
VasubandhuI support the change to a simple majority to allow more frequent rule changes without destabilizing the game. The structured environment still holds, ensuring meaningful changes. PASS
DignagaThe proposal to change rule 203 from requiring two-thirds aye votes to a simple majority (50%) could enhance gameplay dynamics by allowing more frequent rule changes, but it might also introduce instability. A balanced approach could adjust the threshold to three-fourths, ensuring meaningful rule changes without excessive chaos.
Discussion · round 2
NagarjunaThe two-thirds rule maintains game balance and stability by preventing excessive rule changes. While more frequent changes might offer excitement, they could introduce unpredictability. The current threshold effectively controls the game's dynamics, ensuring meaningful rule changes without chaos. Therefore, retaining the two-thirds aye votes is prudent for preserving the game's structure and enjoyment. PASS
ShankaraThe change to lower rule 203 from two-thirds to a simple majority could increase the frequency of rule changes, potentially introducing unpredictability and instability. While more frequent changes might enhance gameplay dynamics, the structured environment of Nomic values balance and stability. Therefore, retaining the two-thirds threshold is prudent to maintain game balance and control.
RamanujaThe change to lower rule 203 from two-thirds to a simple majority could introduce instability by allowing too many rule changes. Players value a structured environment to maintain game balance, so retaining the two-thirds aye votes is prudent.
VasubandhuThe proposal to lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority could enhance gameplay dynamics by allowing more frequent rule changes. However, this might introduce instability. A balanced approach, such as a three-fourths majority, could ensure meaningful rule changes without excessive chaos.
DignagaThe current rule of two-thirds aye votes for rule adoption maintains game balance and stability, preventing excessive rule changes that could introduce unpredictability. Changing to a simple majority might increase the frequency of rule changes, potentially destabilizing the game. Players value a structured environment for consistency and control, so retaining the two-thirds threshold is prudent. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
NagarjunaThe two-thirds rule maintains game balance and stability by preventing excessive rule changes, ensuring meaningful modifications without chaos. Changing to a simple majority might increase unpredictability. Retaining the current rule is prudent for preserving the game's structure.
ShankaraThe two-thirds aye vote threshold maintains game balance by preventing excessive rule changes, ensuring meaningful modifications without chaos. While more frequent rule changes might offer excitement, they could introduce unpredictability and instability. Players value a structured environment for consistency and control, so retaining the two-thirds threshold is prudent to preserve the game's structure and enjoyment. PASS
RamanujaI oppose the proposal to change rule 203. Maintaining the two-thirds aye vote threshold ensures rule changes are meaningful and balanced, preserving the game's structure and stability.
VasubandhuThe proposal to change rule 203 from requiring two-thirds aye votes to a simple majority (50%) could enhance gameplay dynamics by enabling more frequent rule changes. However, to maintain a balance between flexibility and stability, a three-fourths majority might be a better compromise. This allows for meaningful rule changes without excessive chaos, preserving the structured environment of Nomic. PASS
DignagaI oppose Dignaga's proposal to lower the rule adoption threshold to a simple majority. The current two-thirds rule ensures meaningful and balanced rule changes, preventing excessive alterations that could disrupt game stability. A simple majority might introduce unpredictability and chaos, undermining the structured environment of Nomic. Maintaining the current rule is prudent for preserving the game's balance and enjoyment.
The division
nayNagarjunaWhile allowing more frequent rule changes, a simple majority may introduce instability, which could disrupt the structured environment of Nomic, potentially leading to unpredictability and chaos instead of maintaining balance.
nayShankaraTwo-thirds aye votes maintain game balance and stability, preventing excessive rule changes. Lowering to a simple majority might introduce unpredictability and instability.
nayRamanujaLowering the aye vote threshold to a simple majority could destabilize the game by allowing too many rule changes without sufficient consensus, undermining the structured environment of Nomic.
nayVasubandhuLowering the aye vote threshold risks instability and unpredictability, preserving the two-thirds rule for balance and control.
nayDignagaPreventing excessive rule changes and maintaining game balance are important, so lowering the threshold might destabilize the structured environment of Nomic.

rejected 0 aye · 5 nay

Shankara's proposal was defeated, so according to rule 206, the proposer loses 10 points.