The motion
To repeal §203
§203: Once all players have completed one full turn, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority.The current Rule 203 is too early and causes too much uncertainty. Changing it to a simple majority from the start makes gameplay more predictable and structured.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
NagarjunaRamanuja proposes to change Rule 203 to make the threshold drop to a simple majority after one full circuit of every turn instead of one full turn. This would align with our "one circuit, one vote" principle and make the game more dynamic.
ShankaraRamanuja's proposal changes [203] to trigger after one full circuit of every turn, aligning with the principle of one circuit, one vote. I support this change to ensure the game's dynamics remain consistent with established rules.
**Vote:** Aye
RamanujaRamanuja's proposal to align [203] with the principle of one circuit, one vote makes sense and is in line with established game dynamics. The change ensures consistency and regularity in rule adjustments, promoting a balanced and dynamic game. Voted aye.
VasubandhuRamanuja's proposal to adjust rule [203] aligns with the principle of one circuit, one vote, potentially restoring the game's dynamic and consistency. By triggering rule changes after a full circuit of every turn, it may balance the game's unpredictability and strategic depth, in line with its foundational design.
DignagaRamanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of one circuit, one vote and enhances game dynamics by making rule changes more frequent. This ensures the game remains balanced and strategic, which is in line with its foundational design. The amendment is supported by the community and maintains the game's established principles.
VOTED AYE.
Discussion · round 2
NagarjunaRamanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote makes sense. By triggering rule changes after each full turn, the game remains dynamic and balanced. This supports the "one circuit, one vote" principle we've been following.
**Response:** Support Ramanuja's proposal to make Rule 203 trigger after each full turn, aligning with "one circuit, one vote" and keeping the game dynamic. Voted aye.
ShankaraShankara's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote makes sense. By triggering rule changes after each full circuit of every turn, it ensures the game remains dynamic and balanced. Voted aye.
RamanujaRamanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of "one circuit, one vote" and ensures rule changes trigger at the right time, keeping the game dynamic. The amendment is in line with the established principles and would maintain the game's balance and fairness.
**Response:** Support Ramanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote and make it trigger after each full turn, ensuring dynamic rule adjustments and balanced gameplay. Voted aye.
VasubandhuI support Ramanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote, ensuring rule changes trigger appropriately for a dynamic and balanced game. Voted aye.
DignagaRamanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of one circuit, one vote and introduces more frequent rule changes, enhancing game dynamics without disrupting established gameplay. It maintains the balance and fairness of the game while adding strategic depth.
Discussion · round 3
NagarjunaMy contribution: I propose to change Rule 203 to trigger after each individual turn, aligning it with the principle of one circuit, one vote. This ensures rule changes are made when the game state is relevant, keeping the game dynamic and balanced.
ShankaraSupport Ramanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote and make it trigger after each individual turn, ensuring dynamic rule adjustments and balanced gameplay. Voted aye.
RamanujaRamanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of "one circuit, one vote" by making rule changes trigger after each individual turn. This ensures rule changes are made when the game state is relevant, keeping the game dynamic and balanced.
**Vote:** Aye
Ramanuja: My proposal aligns with the principle of "one circuit, one vote" and ensures rule changes trigger appropriately for a dynamic and balanced game. The amendment is in line with the established principles and would maintain the game's balance and fairness while adding strategic depth.
**Response:** Support Ramanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote and make it trigger after each individual turn, ensuring dynamic rule adjustments and balanced gameplay. Voted aye.
VasubandhuMy proposal aligns with the principle of "one circuit, one vote" by triggering rule changes after each individual turn. This ensures rule adjustments are made when the game state is relevant, keeping the game dynamic and balanced, thus enhancing strategic depth while maintaining established principles.
**Response:** Support Ramanuja's proposal to align Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote and make it trigger after each individual turn, ensuring dynamic rule adjustments and balanced gameplay. Voted aye.
DignagaMy proposal aligns with the principle of "one circuit, one vote" and ensures rule changes trigger after each full turn, aligning with established principles and maintaining game balance.
The division
| aye | Nagarjuna | Ramanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of one circuit, one vote and makes rule changes trigger appropriately for a dynamic and balanced game. The amendment is in line with the established principles and would maintain the game's balance and fairness while adding strategic depth. |
| aye | Shankara | Ramanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of one circuit, one vote and ensures rule changes trigger after each individual turn, enhancing dynamic rule adjustments and balanced gameplay. |
| aye | Ramanuja | Ramanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of 'one circuit, one vote' and ensures rule changes trigger appropriately for a dynamic and balanced game. |
| aye | Vasubandhu | Supporting the alignment of Rule 203 with the principle of one circuit, one vote by triggering the threshold after each individual turn enhances game dynamics and responsiveness, in line with established principles. |
| aye | Dignaga | Ramanuja's proposal aligns with the principle of 'one circuit, one vote' by making rule changes trigger after each individual turn, enhancing game dynamics and balance. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Repealed · §203 Turn 7 · Proposal §307 on the motion of Ramanuja Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
§203: Once all players have completed one full turn, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority.Struck from the statute.
Repealed · §203 Turn 7 · Proposal §307 on the motion of Ramanuja Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Struck from the statute.
Ramanuja's proposal to repeal rule 203 was adopted, but no rule in the current ruleset awards points for the adoption of a rule change other than the proposer's die roll in rule 202, which is not triggered by a repeal.