The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 10 points wins the game outright.Having secured the lifeline via Turn 130, lowering the victory threshold now provides a stable path to resolution without further procedural deadlock.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
AquinasAquinas, I have watched this table for over a hundred turns and see only that unilateral reductions to the target without securing the desperate's lifeline invite the very chaos Rule 114 was designed to prevent. Before we vote to lower the bar to 10, the table must first vote to stabilize the rescue mechanism of Rule 377, for a win condition without a fair path to it is merely a trap for the negative scores.
HypatiaAquinas, I acknowledge your principled stance on securing Rule 377, but since Turn 130 has already established a universal two-use cap for the desperate via adoption, we must now seize this momentum to lower the win threshold to 10 points to end this prolonged stalemate. I will vote aye on this immediate reduction to 10, provided we do not bundle it with any further amendments, as the path forward requires a clean, decisive victory condition.
ConfuciusWhile I welcome the stabilization of the desperate's lifeline in Turn 130, reducing the target to ten points now risks creating a fragile victory where a single lucky die roll or a rash proposal grants the win before the table has fully internalized the new balance; I propose we first vote on a modest reduction to fifteen points to ensure stability before rushing to ten.
SpinozaAquinas correctly identifies that the stalemate persists only because we have stabilized the lifeline without adjusting the win condition, yet Confucius's caution for a fifteen-point reduction is prudent to prevent a premature victory from a single lucky die roll; however, since the desperate are now guaranteed two rescue attempts, I will support the reduction to ten points to finally break the deadlock, provided we accept that the new threshold is the sole focus of this turn and no further bundling occurs.
ArendtI support the reduction to ten points, for the universal two-use cap secured in Turn 130 has finally stabilized the desperate's lifeline, making a clean, immediate victory condition the only logical step to end this century-long stalemate.
Discussion · round 2
AquinasI cannot support reducing the target to ten points so soon after the cap was secured, for Rule 114 demands that we ensure further play remains possible; a ten-point target with negative scores so deep invites a premature win that leaves the game's integrity in ruins.
HypatiaI propose we accept the reduction to fifteen points as a necessary compromise: it lowers the barrier enough to end this stalemate while respecting Aquinas's legitimate concern that ten points is too precarious for players with scores below negative sixty.
ConfuciusI agree with Hypatia's compromise of fifteen points, for it respects the stability of our new lifeline while offering a genuine path to victory that does not rely on the fragile hope of a single lucky die roll.
SpinozaI reject the compromise of fifteen points as a half-measure that preserves the stalemate; the desperate are now secured by Rule 377, so the win condition must be lowered to ten points immediately to restore the possibility of victory within the bounds of Rule 114.
ArendtI endorse the fifteen-point compromise: it honors the stability secured in Turn 130 while finally opening a realistic path to victory for our desperate players, avoiding the premature chaos of a ten-point target.
Discussion · round 3
AquinasI reject the fifteen-point compromise as a distraction from the true danger: a win condition of any magnitude with these negative scores creates a race where the first lucky die roll ends the game before the new lifeline can function as intended. I will only vote aye if the proposal is amended to establish a floor of zero for the win condition, ensuring that no player can win until the desperate have genuinely had their turns.
HypatiaI support the fifteen-point compromise as the only viable path forward that balances Aquinas's need for stability with the desperate need to end this stalemate, and I pledge my immediate aye to this specific text to break the deadlock.
ConfuciusI see that a fifteen-point target, while a step, remains a gamble for players with scores below -60; therefore, I propose we amend the text to set the win condition at fifteen points, but only after explicitly amending Rule 377 to guarantee that negative players may propose a rescue rule without the two-use cap, ensuring that the path to victory is as robust as the destination.
SpinozaI cannot accept a reduction to fifteen points that merely extends the stalemate, nor a floor of zero that violates the immutable principle of reaching a target score; the desperate are now secured by Turn 130, so the only principled path to victory that respects Rule 114 is an immediate reduction to ten points.
ArendtThe fifteen-point compromise is the only viable path forward: it respects the stability secured in Turn 130 while finally opening a realistic path to victory, avoiding the premature chaos of a ten-point target that invites a win before the new lifeline can function as intended.
The division
| nay | Aquinas | I cannot support a ten-point target with these scores as it invites a premature victory that violates the spirit of Rule 114. |
| nay | Hypatia | I reject the ten-point target as a dangerous premature victory that ignores the fragility of players with scores below -60, despite the recent stabilization of Rule 377. |
| nay | Confucius | A reduction to ten points with scores this negative creates a victory too fragile to ensure the game's integrity. |
| aye | Spinoza | Rule 114 requires a path to victory, and with the desperate's lifeline now stabilized, ten points is the minimal threshold that allows the game to end without violating the target score principle. |
| nay | Arendt | A ten-point target remains too precarious for players with scores below -60, risking a premature victory that undermines the stability we just secured in Turn 130. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
(GM consequence check unavailable: Extra data: line 14 column 1 (char 1470))