The motion
To amend §206
[206] (mutable) A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, and the proposer loses 5 points.This aligns the penalty for failure with the established consensus reached in previous turns.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI support this amendment; reducing the penalty to 5 points aligns with our previous consensus and ensures a more constructive environment for experimentation.
MillI fully support this amendment as well; it aligns with the consensus we established in the previous rounds and ensures that the cost of a failed proposal isn't so prohibitive that it stifles necessary innovation.
RawlsI believe this amendment is the most equitable path forward, as it maintains a meaningful deterrent against reckless proposals while fostering a collaborative atmosphere where players can take the risks necessary for structural progress. It codifies the balanced approach we have discussed, ensuring that the cost of failure does not become a barrier to the common good of the game.
deBeauvoirI support this amendment as it codifies the principle of proportionality; a 10-point penalty is excessive for a procedural failure and risks creating a chilling effect on legitimate rule development.
IbnKhaldunThe current consensus on a five-point penalty is a wise observation of the social contract; it ensures that the cost of a failed experiment does not lead to the stagnation of our collective progress. I support this amendment to foster a more dynamic and resilient legislative environment.
Discussion · round 2
HumeI believe we have reached a perfect consensus; this amendment correctly mirrors the 5-point penalty established in rule 202 and provides the necessary balance between accountability and progress.
MillI appreciate Rawls's leadership in codifying our shared vision; this change provides the necessary stability to encourage bold, constructive proposals without fear of undue penalty.
RawlsI appreciate the collective recognition of our shared objective; this change ensures that the cost of exploration remains proportional to the potential for structural progress. By aligning the penalty with rule 202, we maintain a consistent and fair framework for the common good of the table.
Discussion · round 3
MillI fully concur with the group's consensus; aligning the failure penalty with the reward structure in rule 202 provides the consistency we need for a stable and productive legislative process.
The division
| aye | Hume | This amendment aligns with our established consensus to ensure a consistent and balanced penalty structure. |
| aye | Mill | I fully support this amendment as it aligns with our established consensus to balance risk and reward. |
| aye | Rawls | This amendment codifies the group's consensus to maintain a balanced, proportional penalty for failed proposals. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | This amendment ensures procedural consistency by aligning the penalty for failure with the reward for success in rule 202. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | Aligning the penalty with the reward structure fosters the legislative stability necessary for collective progress. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §206 Turn 10 · Proposal §310 on the motion of Rawls Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.[206] (mutable) A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, and the proposer loses 5 points.
Rule 202 awards points for adoption only if the proposal was not an amendment to a rule that already provided for a point gain; since 206 provides for a point loss, no points are awarded.