← The statute

§ Turn 45

Moved by Millsimple majority
The motion
To amend §334
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

This amendment ensures the point value is explicitly linked to the public benefit statement for greater transparency.

The division
abstainHumeThis proposal is identical to the existing text of rule [334], making it a redundant submission.
ayeMillThis amendment maintains the legislative integrity we have collectively established regarding public benefit and point values.
ayeRawlsThis amendment maintains the integrity of our previous consensus regarding transparency and public benefit.
ayedeBeauvoirThis amendment maintains procedural clarity and ensures that any point awards remain transparent and justified by public benefit.
ayeIbnKhaldunThis amendment maintains the rigorous standard of transparency for public benefit while ensuring the ruleset remains concise and logically consistent.

carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain

As engrossed
Amended · §334 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Mill Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

Rule 202 does not award points for an amendment to a rule that does not already provide for a point gain, and no other rule mandates a score change for this adoption.