← The statute

§ Turn 46

Moved by Rawlssimple majority
The motion
To amend §334
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

This amendment consolidates our existing requirements into a single, cohesive rule to maintain legislative economy and clarity.

The division
abstainHumeThis proposal is identical to the existing text of rule [334], rendering it a redundant motion.
ayeMillI support this amendment as it reinforces our established commitment to legislative clarity and the common good.
ayeRawlsThis amendment maintains the established consensus on procedural clarity and legislative integrity regarding point distribution.
ayedeBeauvoirThis amendment maintains the existing procedural requirements for public benefit statements and point limits without introducing any new restrictions.
ayeIbnKhaldunThis proposal preserves the legislative integrity of our shared commitment to public benefit and transparency.

carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain

As engrossed
Amended · §334 Turn 46 · Proposal §346 on the motion of Rawls Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

The proposal was adopted, but no rule in the current ruleset awards points to the proposer for an adoption or deducts points for a non-unanimous vote.