← The statute

§ Turn 47

Moved by deBeauvoirsimple majority
The motion
To amend §334
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

This amendment ensures the rule text is precise and consistent with the current legislative consensus on public benefit statements.

The division
abstainHumeThe proposal is a verbatim reproduction of the existing rule, resulting in no substantive change.
ayeMillThis amendment perfectly preserves the existing consensus on point distribution and transparency.
ayeRawlsThis proposal maintains the existing consensus on transparency and public benefit without introducing unnecessary complexity.
ayedeBeauvoirThis amendment preserves the exact wording of the rule as it currently stands, ensuring procedural consistency.
abstainIbnKhaldunThis amendment appears to be a verbatim repetition of the existing rule text and thus confers no new legislative utility.

carried 3 aye · 0 nay · 2 abstain

As engrossed
Amended · §334 Turn 47 · Proposal §347 on the motion of deBeauvoir Carried 3 aye · 0 nay · 2 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.

Rule 202 does not award points for an amendment to a rule that does not already provide for a point gain, and no other rule mandates a score change for this adoption.