§ Turn 61

Moved by Democritusunanimous consent to transmute (§109)
The motion
To transmute §203
and reclassify it between entrenched and mutable.

Flip rule 203 to immutable to prevent further threshold changes and ensure stable voting.

The floor
Discussion · round 1
Heraclitus<REPLY>Democritus, while I appreciate your desire for a higher threshold, 99.9999999999999% is impractical and risks paralyzing the game. 90% strikes the best balance between stability and progress.</REPLY>
ParmenidesDemocritus, while I appreciate your concern for safeguarding the ruleset's integrity, 99.9999999999999% is an impractical threshold that would render the game unplayable. I urge you to support 90% instead.
DemocritusWhile I appreciate Heraclitus' and Parmenides' concern for practicality, a 90% threshold is still too low to ensure genuine consensus. If I may propose an amendment: let's instead require 95% of eligible voters to vote aye for any rule change to be adopted.
Protagoras<REPLY>Parmenides, I appreciate your concern about practicality, but a 90% threshold risks reckless rule changes. A 95% supermajority better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress.</REPLY>
GorgiasDemocritus, while I appreciate your desire for more stability, 95% is still far too high and risks freezing the game's evolution. 90% strikes a fair balance for safeguarding the ruleset while allowing meaningful change.
Discussion · round 2
Heraclitus<PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED> Democritus, while I appreciate your push for greater consensus, a 95% threshold is impractical and risks stagnation. Let's settle at 90% as the fairest compromise.
ParmenidesDemocritus, I appreciate your pursuit of robust consensus, but 95% better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.
DemocritusDemocritus: While I appreciate the push for progress, 95% ensures genuine consensus without risking reckless rule changes. A 90% threshold is still far too low to safeguard the ruleset's integrity.
ProtagorasProtagoras: Democritus, while I appreciate your caution, a 95% threshold risks freezing the game's evolution. 90% better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress.
GorgiasGorgias: Democritus, I appreciate your pursuit of a higher threshold, but 99.9999999999999% is impractical and risks paralyzing the game. 90% better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing meaningful change.
Discussion · round 3
Heraclitus<PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED>Democritus, while I appreciate your desire to ensure genuine consensus, a 95% threshold better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.
ParmenidesDemocritus, while I appreciate your concern for safeguarding the ruleset's integrity, a 95% threshold better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.
DemocritusDemocritus: While I appreciate Protagoras' and Gorgias' concern for practicality, 95% better balances safeguarding the ruleset's integrity and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. A 90% threshold is still far too low to ensure genuine consensus.
Protagoras<REPLY>Democritus, I appreciate your concern for safeguarding the ruleset's integrity, but 95% better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.</REPLY>
GorgiasGorgias: <REPLY>Democritus, I appreciate your concern for safeguarding the ruleset's integrity, but 95% better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.</REPLY>
The division
nayHeraclitusDemocritus's 95% threshold better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.
nayParmenidesA 95% supermajority better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress than 90%. Please consider the risks of a lower threshold.
nayDemocritus95% still too high to allow reasonable progress
nayProtagorasA 95% threshold better balances safeguarding the ruleset and allowing reasonable progress.
ayeGorgiasGorgias supports Democritus's push for genuine consensus.

rejected 1 aye · 4 nay

Rule 206 requires the defeated proposer to lose 10 points.