The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Reiterates clear, automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits of play.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HeraclitusHeraclitus: A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
ParmenidesDemocritus: The proposed amendment to [203] maintains our current, clear transition to majority rule while preserving the option to revert to unanimity if necessary. I urge all players to support this compromise approach.
DemocritusDemocritus: I support this amendment. It offers a clear, automatic transition to majority rule while preserving unanimous consent as an option. This balance maintains fairness and stability, and I urge all players to support it.
ProtagorasDemocritus: I support the proposal for a clear, automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits, while preserving unanimity as a fallback option.
GorgiasI believe we have already reached consensus on the wording of this amendment; it preserves unanimity as an option while offering a clear and automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits, which maintains fairness and stability for all players. I urge all to support this compromise approach.
Discussion · round 2
HeraclitusHeraclitus: I am pleased with this amendment's clear wording and its preservation of unanimity as an option. I will support this proposal, as it advances a reasonable compromise and maintains stability.
ParmenidesHeraclitus's proposed amendment maintains our current, clear transition to majority rule while preserving unanimity as an option. This is a sound compromise that maintains fairness and stability for all players.
DemocritusDemocritus: This amendment provides a clear, automatic transition to majority rule while preserving unanimity as a fallback option. I support this compromise approach, as it maintains fairness and stability for all players.
ProtagorasProtagoras: I concur with the proposal for a clear, automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits, while preserving unanimity as a fallback option.
GorgiasHeraclitus: I believe we have reached a consensus on the amendment's wording; it preserves unanimity as an option while offering a clear and automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits, which maintains fairness and stability for all players. I urge all to support this compromise approach.
Discussion · round 3
HeraclitusHeraclitus: This amendment is a sound compromise that preserves unanimity as an option while clearly defining the transition to majority rule. I support it.
ParmenidesDemocritus: I appreciate the consensus reached on this amendment. While the wording is clear, I urge all players to consider the timing of the transition. Delaying the shift to majority rule allows for more deliberate decision-making, which benefits all players in the long run.
DemocritusDemocritus: Democritus: I appreciate the feedback, but the proposed amendment already provides a clear, automatic transition while preserving unanimity as a fallback option. This balance ensures fairness and stability for all players. I urge all to support this compromise approach.
ProtagorasProtagoras: Protagoras: The proposal's clear wording and preservation of unanimity as an option are sound and should be adopted. I support it.
Gorgias<response>
I support the proposal for a clear, automatic transition to majority rule after two full circuits, while preserving unanimity as an option. I urge all players to support this compromise approach, as it maintains fairness and stability for all players.
</response>
The division
| nay | Heraclitus | This amendment does not improve the current wording, and I prefer no change over unnecessary alterations. |
| aye | Parmenides | A clear compromise benefits everyone, preserving unanimity as an option while ensuring eventual progress. |
| aye | Democritus | This amendment offers a clear, fair compromise that maintains stability for all players. |
| nay | Protagoras | I support unanimity as an option only if it's clearly defined and necessary. |
| aye | Gorgias | The proposal offers a clear, automatic transition to majority rule while preserving unanimity as an option, which maintains fairness and stability for all players. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Democritus's proposal was defeated, which according to rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points.