The motion
To add §306
306. The number of points gained for an adopted rule change is equal to the value of the die roll, unless the roll is 1, in which case the player gains 3 points.This establishes the specific point values referenced in rule 202 to provide a clear and consistent reward structure.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI believe this addition is a necessary step to provide the structural clarity we sought in my previous turn; by formalizing the reward mechanism, we replace uncertainty with a predictable, rule-governed progression.
MillI support this addition as it provides the necessary clarity for rule 202 and ensures a consistent reward structure that we have been moving toward. It is a logical step to formalize the mechanics we've discussed in previous turns.
RawlsI agree with Hume and Mill; formalizing the reward structure in rule 306 provides the necessary clarity to ensure the game remains balanced and predictable for all participants.
deBeauvoirI support this addition as it provides the formal definition required by rule 202, ensuring the ruleset remains precise and consistent. It is a principled step toward the procedural clarity I demand.
IbnKhaldunI concur with this formalization; establishing a clear, rule-governed reward structure is a prerequisite for a stable and flourishing social order within our game. By anchoring the reward to a specific rule, we replace the arbitrary with the institutional.
Discussion · round 2
MillI fully concur with the consensus; this rule provides the precise mechanism rule 202 requires to ensure our progression remains both predictable and balanced. It is a solid foundation for the game's mechanics that I am happy to support.
deBeauvoirI support this addition as it provides the necessary formal definition required by rule 202, ensuring the ruleset remains precise and consistent. It is a principled step toward the procedural clarity I demand.
IbnKhaldunBy formalizing this reward, we move from a state of nature—where the mechanics are arbitrary—to a state of civilization, where the rules of progression are codified and transparent. I support this proposal as a vital step in establishing the institutional stability required for a flourishing game.
Discussion · round 3
MillI appreciate the consensus forming around this; it perfectly codifies the transition from the arbitrary to the structured that we've discussed throughout the game. I am happy to support this as a necessary foundation for our continued play.
RawlsI believe this addition is the final piece needed to provide the procedural integrity we have collectively sought; by codifying the reward in rule 306, we ensure the game's progression is governed by transparent, shared principles rather than arbitrary chance.
IbnKhaldunThe transition from the arbitrary to the codified is the hallmark of a maturing civilization; I support this rule as it provides the structural permanence necessary for our collective progress. By establishing this clear reward, we ensure that the growth of our scores reflects a governed order rather than mere happenstance.
The division
| aye | Hume | This provides the necessary structural clarity and predictable reward mechanism we have collectively sought. |
| aye | Mill | This rule provides the necessary structural clarity and consistency for our reward mechanism that we have all agreed upon. |
| aye | Rawls | This change provides the necessary procedural clarity and predictability to ensure the game remains balanced for all players. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | This proposal provides the necessary formal definition for rule 202 to ensure procedural precision and consistency. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | Codifying the reward structure transitions our game from a state of arbitrary chance to one of institutional order. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §311 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Hume Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
306. The number of points gained for an adopted rule change is equal to the value of the die roll, unless the roll is 1, in which case the player gains 3 points.
No rule in the current ruleset awards points for the adoption of a rule change; rule 202 only awards points if the proposal is adopted, but it specifies the points are equal to the value in rule 306, which was just added and does not yet provide a value for this specific turn's outcome.