Turn 14 — Nomic

The motion

To amend §204

Reducing the dissent reward to 1 point further minimizes the incentive to obstruct progress while maintaining the integrity of the majority rule.

The floor

Discussion · round 1

HumeI find this reduction in the dissent reward to be a prudent move toward greater stability, as it further diminishes the incentive for obstructive voting. I am prepared to support this amendment as it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a cooperative legislative environment.

MillI agree with Hume; reducing the dissent reward to 1 point further minimizes the incentive for obstruction while still acknowledging the cost of opposition. This seems like a fair compromise to ensure our legislative process remains productive and cohesive.

RawlsI concur with the sentiment expressed by Hume and Mill; reducing the reward to 1 point maintains the integrity of the dissenter's right while significantly de-incentivizing purely obstructive behavior. This adjustment promotes a more cooperative atmosphere for the common good of the table.

deBeauvoirI concur with the others; a 1-point reward is a more principled reflection of the minor cost of dissent compared to the previous 2-point reward, ensuring that the move toward a simple majority does not inadvertently incentivize a "spoiler" strategy.

IbnKhaldunI concur with this refinement; a one-point reward ensures that the cost of obstruction remains slightly higher than the benefit, preserving the dignity of the legislative process while favoring the progress of the collective.

Discussion · round 2

MillI appreciate the unanimous consensus forming here; this 1-point reward is a perfect middle ground that preserves the right to dissent without creating a significant "spoiler" incentive. I fully support deBeauvoir's proposal as it fosters the cooperative environment we all seem to value.

IbnKhaldunI believe this refinement is essential; by reducing the reward to a single point, we ensure that the pursuit of individual advantage does not undermine the collective's ability to build a stable and flourishing legal order.

Discussion · round 3

MillI appreciate the unanimous consensus on this; by refining the dissent reward to 1 point, we effectively balance individual agency with our collective goal of a stable, cooperative ruleset. I fully support deBeauvoir's proposal.

RawlsI believe this adjustment is a vital step toward a more harmonious legislative environment. By reducing the reward to 1 point, we ensure that the move to a simple majority serves to facilitate progress rather than rewarding obstruction, thereby upholding the common good of the table.

deBeauvoirI have no further contributions to make; the consensus is clear and the proposed wording is precise. PASS

The division

aye	Hume	This amendment strengthens the stability of our legislative process by further de-incentivizing obstructive behavior.
aye	Mill	This 1-point reward perfectly balances the rights of dissenters with our collective goal of minimizing obstruction.
aye	Rawls	This reduction effectively de-incentivizes obstruction while preserving the right to dissent, supporting our collective goal of a stable and cooperative game.
aye	deBeauvoir	I support this amendment as it aligns with my commitment to procedural fairness by minimizing the incentive for obstruction.
aye	IbnKhaldun	Reducing the dissent reward to one point preserves the legislative dignity of our assembly by ensuring that obstruction yields less than the cost of progress.

carried 5 aye · 0 nay

As engrossed

Amended · §204 Turn 14 · Proposal §314 on the motion of deBeauvoir Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

[204] (mutable) A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 2 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.[204] (mutable) A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 1 point and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.

Amended · §204 Turn 14 · Proposal §314 on the motion of deBeauvoir Carried 5 aye · 0 nay

[204] (mutable) A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 1 point and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.[204] (mutable) A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 2 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.

Rule 202 awards the proposer points equal to the value specified in rule 306 (which is 3 points for a roll of 1, but since 306 exists, it is the value of the die roll); however, since no die was thrown for an amendment, the default of 3 points from rule 202 applies.