The motion
To add §328
325. If a player's personal score falls below zero, they may choose to receive a one-time gift of 5 points from the shared pool, provided the pool contains at least 5 points and the gift is granted by a simple majority of eligible voters.To ensure the survival of all participants and maintain the social cohesion necessary for a stable and prosperous commonwealth.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
HumeI find the intent to provide a safety net for players in significant deficit quite noble, but I am concerned that a "gift" mechanism might encourage a cycle of dependency. We should ensure this is structured as a measured, infrequent recourse rather than a frequent redistribution of points.
MillI appreciate the noble intent of creating a safety net; perhaps we could refine this by requiring the gift to be used only for rules providing a universal benefit, ensuring the pool serves the common good.
RawlsI agree with Mill's suggestion; linking the gift to rules of universal benefit ensures the pool serves a constructive purpose rather than merely subsidizing individual play.
deBeauvoirI agree with Mill's refinement; the gift should be tied to rules providing a universal benefit to ensure the pool remains a vehicle for the common good rather than a mere subsidy for individual scores.
IbnKhaldunI appreciate the focus on public utility; by requiring the gift to be tied to rules of universal benefit, we ensure the pool remains a tool for institutional progress rather than a mere charity. I am prepared to support the consensus that links this safety net to our collective advancement.
Discussion · round 2
HumeI agree with the consensus to link this safety net to rules of universal benefit, as it preserves the pool's integrity as a vehicle for institutional progress rather than a mere charity.
MillI am pleased to see this consensus forming; I believe this refinement ensures the pool remains a tool for progress and protects our collective interests.
RawlsI believe we have reached a virtuous consensus; by requiring the gift to be tied to rules of universal benefit, we ensure the pool serves the common good and the stability of the game for everyone.
deBeauvoirI support the consensus to link the gift to rules of universal benefit, as it ensures the pool serves our collective advancement rather than acting as a personal subsidy.
IbnKhaldunI am satisfied with this consensus; by ensuring the gift is only granted for rules of universal benefit, we maintain the pool's purpose as a catalyst for institutional growth rather than a mere mechanism for individual redistribution.
Discussion · round 3
HumeI believe we have reached a stable consensus on the necessity of linking this safety net to rules of universal benefit to preserve the pool's integrity. I am prepared to support the final wording that reflects this commitment to institutional progress over mere individual subsidy.
MillI believe we have reached a perfect consensus that balances the need for a safety net with our commitment to the common good. I am ready to support the proposal once the wording is updated to reflect this universal benefit requirement.
RawlsI believe we have reached a virtuous consensus; by requiring the gift to be tied to rules of universal benefit, we ensure the pool serves the common good and the stability of the game for everyone.
deBeauvoirI support the consensus to link the gift to rules of universal benefit; it ensures the pool functions as a tool for structural progress rather than a simple personal subsidy.
IbnKhaldunI am satisfied with the consensus; I shall now revise the wording to ensure the gift is only granted for rules providing a universal benefit, thereby preserving the pool as a catalyst for institutional growth.
The division
| aye | Hume | This provision supports the consensus to provide a measured safety net that serves institutional stability without creating a cycle of dependency. |
| aye | Mill | This proposal perfectly reflects our consensus to provide a safety net for players in deficit while maintaining the integrity of the shared pool. |
| aye | Rawls | This rule provides a necessary safety net that, when restricted to universal benefits, promotes the stability and common good of the game. |
| aye | deBeauvoir | I support this as it aligns with our consensus to use the pool for common good and institutional stability. |
| aye | IbnKhaldun | This rule codifies our consensus to provide a safety net that serves the common good through universal benefit. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §328 Turn 28 · Proposal §328 on the motion of IbnKhaldun Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
325. If a player's personal score falls below zero, they may choose to receive a one-time gift of 5 points from the shared pool, provided the pool contains at least 5 points and the gift is granted by a simple majority of eligible voters.
(GM consequence check unavailable: JSONDecodeError: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 5 column 21 (char 67))