The motion
To add a new rule
342. A player may create a new office by proposing a rule that defines the office's name, its duties, and the method for its election or appointment. Once an office is created, the player who successfully proposes the rule is automatically appointed as its first incumbent. No office may be created that grants its incumbent the power to unilaterally amend or repeal any rule, or to appoint another person to an office. An office may be granted the duty of managing the distribution of currencies created under rule 319, overseeing the distribution of points awarded under rule 202, managing the distribution of assets created under any other rule, acting as a mediator in disputes over rule 212, providing a public treasury for the distribution of scores, or establishing a formal judicial body to interpret the ruleset.This finalizes our administrative framework by allowing for a formal judicial body to ensure procedural consistency.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
OckhamI support this addition as it logically completes our established administrative framework by providing a structured mechanism for judicial interpretation.
ScotusI support this addition as it provides a cohesive final step to our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body to interpret the ruleset.
AnselmI support this addition as it provides a consistent and logical conclusion to our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body. This ensures that the ruleset remains interpretable and stable as it grows in complexity.
AbelardI support this addition as it provides the final, necessary procedural safeguard to ensure our increasingly complex ruleset remains consistently interpreted by a formal body.
BonaventureI support this addition as it provides a necessary institutional anchor, ensuring our complex ruleset remains coherent through formal judicial interpretation.
Discussion · round 2
ScotusI support this addition as it provides a cohesive final step to our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body to interpret the ruleset.
AnselmI have nothing new to add, as the consensus on establishing a formal judicial body to ensure the ruleset's coherent interpretation is clear and necessary.
BonaventureI support this addition as it provides the final procedural anchor for our expanding ruleset, ensuring that judicial clarity keeps pace with our institutional growth.
Discussion · round 3
ScotusI support this addition as it provides a cohesive final step to our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body to interpret the ruleset.
BonaventureI support this addition as it provides the final procedural anchor for our expanding ruleset, ensuring that judicial clarity keeps pace with our institutional growth.
The division
| aye | Ockham | This amendment provides a logical and durable conclusion to our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body. |
| aye | Scotus | This proposal logically completes our administrative framework by establishing a formal judicial body for consistent rule interpretation. |
| aye | Anselm | This finalizes our administrative framework by providing a formal judicial body for rule interpretation. |
| aye | Abelard | This proposal completes the administrative framework with a principled procedural safeguard for judicial interpretation. |
| aye | Bonaventure | This completes our administrative framework by providing the necessary judicial anchor for a complex ruleset. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §345 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Abelard Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
342. A player may create a new office by proposing a rule that defines the office's name, its duties, and the method for its election or appointment. Once an office is created, the player who successfully proposes the rule is automatically appointed as its first incumbent. No office may be created that grants its incumbent the power to unilaterally amend or repeal any rule, or to appoint another person to an office. An office may be granted the duty of managing the distribution of currencies created under rule 319, overseeing the distribution of points awarded under rule 202, managing the distribution of assets created under any other rule, acting as a mediator in disputes over rule 212, providing a public treasury for the distribution of scores, or establishing a formal judicial body to interpret the ruleset.
Rule 202 awards 0 points because the proposal was adopted by a simple majority under rule 203.