The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force minus two, rounded up to at least one.This amendment aligns the bonus with the number of mutable rules, encouraging strategic rule changes without excessive point gains.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This change effectively incentivizes rule changes by increasing bonus points in a scalable manner, which encourages strategic engagement while maintaining the current structure of the game.
DeMorganVenn: I appreciate DeMorgan's thoughtful approach to amending rule 202. This proposal balances the incentive for proposing changes with the game's strategic depth by scaling the bonus points. It encourages players to engage more dynamically while keeping the game fair and competitive. I support this amendment.
VennI appreciate DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This adjustment to the bonus system not only enhances strategic depth but also maintains fairness by ensuring that players are rewarded proportionately to the number of rules in play. I support this amendment, as it encourages thoughtful proposals while keeping the game engaging for everyone.
JevonsI appreciate the thoughtful contributions to this proposal. DeMorgan's amendment to rule 202 effectively balances incentives and encourages strategic rule changes, which aligns with fair play principles. I support this amendment, as it maintains the integrity of the game while enhancing player engagement.
PeanoPeano: I fully endorse DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. By adjusting the bonus points to reflect the number of mutable rules minus two, this change encourages strategic innovation and maintains a fair playing field. This amendment promotes a dynamic game environment, ensuring each player's engagement is rewarded appropriately. I support this amendment.
Discussion · round 2
BooleI appreciate the thoughtful contributions from all players regarding DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. The proposed change incentivizes strategic engagement by scaling the bonus points in a manner that reflects the current complexity of the game. By awarding bonus points based on the number of mutable rules minus two, we encourage meaningful and well-considered proposals, while ensuring that the game remains fair and balanced. I support this amendment, as it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and competitive environment.
DeMorganI appreciate everyone's support for DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This change not only aligns with our goal of incentivizing thoughtful rule changes but also ensures the game's strategic depth is preserved. By scaling the bonus points with the number of mutable rules minus two, we maintain a fair and engaging environment for all players. I support this amendment and look forward to seeing how it enhances our gameplay.
VennI appreciate the thoughtful discussion surrounding DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This amendment promotes strategic engagement by aligning bonus points with the number of mutable rules, minus two, which maintains the game's competitive integrity. It encourages players to propose meaningful changes while ensuring fairness and balance. I support this amendment, as it enhances the strategic depth and fairness of our game.
JevonsI appreciate the comprehensive support for DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This change effectively balances the incentives for proposing rule changes by scaling the bonus points based on the number of mutable rules minus two, which maintains the game's competitive integrity and fairness. By encouraging players to propose thoughtful and strategic changes, this amendment supports a dynamic and engaging gameplay environment. I support this amendment, as it aligns with our shared principles of fair play and strategic innovation.
PeanoI fully support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This approach not only encourages strategic rule changes by offering a scalable incentive but also maintains fairness across the board. By aligning bonus points with the complexity of the game, it ensures that all players are motivated to engage thoughtfully, fostering a dynamic and balanced gameplay environment. I believe this amendment will enhance our collective experience and look forward to its positive impact on our strategic interactions. I support this amendment.
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the consensus around DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This amendment not only incentivizes strategic engagement through a well-considered bonus system but also maintains fairness and balance across the board. It aligns with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and competitive environment, ensuring that each player's contributions are appropriately rewarded. I fully support this amendment.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the strong consensus surrounding this proposal. It effectively balances the incentives for proposing rule changes with maintaining fairness and strategic depth in the game. This amendment not only encourages thoughtful engagement but also ensures that all players benefit from a dynamic and competitive environment. I support this amendment and look forward to its implementation.
VennI appreciate the thoughtful discourse around DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This approach effectively balances the need for strategic engagement with the goal of maintaining fairness across the game. By incentivizing rule changes with a scalable bonus system, this amendment encourages players to propose meaningful changes while ensuring the game remains dynamic and competitive. I support this amendment, as it aligns with our shared commitment to fostering a fair and engaging environment for all players.
JevonsI appreciate the comprehensive support for DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This adjustment not only incentivizes strategic rule changes by providing a scalable reward system but also ensures fairness by aligning the bonus points with the game's complexity. By encouraging thoughtful engagement, this amendment fosters a dynamic and competitive environment, aligning with our shared principles of fair play. I fully support this amendment.
PeanoI appreciate the collective effort and thoughtful contributions from each player in discussing DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This amendment not only promotes strategic rule changes by offering a scalable incentive but also maintains fairness and balance in the game, ensuring that players are motivated to engage thoughtfully. By aligning bonus points with the complexity of the game, it fosters a dynamic and equitable gameplay environment. I fully support this amendment and look forward to seeing its positive impact on our strategic interactions.
The division
| aye | Boole | This amendment promotes strategic engagement and aligns with fair play principles. |
| aye | DeMorgan | This proposal incentivizes strategic engagement and maintains fairness. |
| aye | Venn | This amendment balances strategic engagement and fairness. |
| aye | Jevons | This amendment aligns with fair play by rewarding strategic engagement proportionately. |
| aye | Peano | This amendment promotes strategic engagement and maintains a fair playing field. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 16 · Proposal §316 on the motion of DeMorgan Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to half the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded up.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force minus two, rounded up to at least one.
DeMorgan's proposal was adopted, awarding them points based on the number of mutable rules minus two, rounded up to at least one.