The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, with a minimum of one and a maximum of ten.To encourage strategic proposals by scaling bonus points with mutable rule count.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate Boole's initiative to introduce a sliding scale for bonus points, as this proposal aligns with our shared interest in maintaining a strategic and dynamic gameplay environment. By capping the bonus at ten points, we effectively balance the potential for significant score swings while incentivizing rule changes, thus encouraging players to engage thoughtfully with each proposal. This amendment supports the overarching goal of fostering a competitive yet fair game structure, where strategic depth is prioritized over arbitrary rule manipulation. I support this proposal, confident that it will enrich our gameplay experience.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate Boole's proposal to amend rule [202] by introducing a sliding scale for bonus points, capped at ten. This amendment strikes a balance between encouraging strategic rule changes and preventing excessive score inflation, thus fostering a competitive and engaging environment. By setting a maximum, we ensure that while players are incentivized to propose meaningful changes, the game remains fair and balanced for all participants. I fully support this amendment, as it aligns with our collective interest in maintaining a dynamic yet equitable gameplay experience.
PASS
VennI appreciate Boole's proposal to adjust rule [202] by implementing a sliding scale for bonus points with a maximum cap of ten. This change not only encourages more strategic and thoughtful rule amendments but also helps maintain a balanced competitive environment. By capping the maximum bonus points, we prevent excessive score inflation, ensuring that all players remain engaged and motivated to contribute constructively. This amendment supports the game's overall fairness and strategic depth, making it an appealing adjustment for all players. I support this proposal wholeheartedly.
JevonsJevons: I support Boole's proposal for amending rule [202] with a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten. This adjustment balances the need to incentivize strategic proposals while preventing excessive score inflation, which could skew the game unfairly. By setting a cap, we ensure the game remains competitive and engaging for all players, fostering a fair environment where each rule change is carefully considered. I believe this amendment aligns well with our goal of maintaining a balanced and dynamic gameplay experience.
PASS
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the strategic intent behind Boole's proposal to amend rule [202], introducing a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten. This adjustment effectively balances the need for incentivizing meaningful rule changes while preventing excessive score inflation, ensuring the game remains fair and competitive for all players. By setting a cap, we encourage thoughtful engagement and maintain the strategic integrity of the game. I support this proposal, as it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic yet equitable gameplay environment.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I appreciate the consensus around this amendment to rule [202]. By introducing a sliding scale with a cap of ten points, we effectively balance the strategic depth of the game with fairness. This proposal encourages thoughtful rule changes while preventing excessive score inflation, ensuring a competitive environment for all players. I fully support this amendment, confident it will enhance our gameplay experience.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the thoughtful contributions everyone has made to this amendment. By setting a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten, we ensure the game remains dynamic and strategic, while preventing disproportionate score gains. This adjustment supports our shared goal of maintaining fairness and encourages players to propose meaningful rule changes. I fully support this proposal and look forward to its positive impact on our gameplay.
VennVenn: I appreciate the collaborative effort in refining this proposal. By setting a maximum bonus point cap of ten, we effectively balance the game's competitive nature while encouraging strategic rule changes. This amendment ensures that all players remain engaged and motivated to contribute constructively, maintaining the game's fairness and strategic depth. I support this proposal, confident it will enrich our gameplay experience.
PASS
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the comprehensive discussion around Boole's proposal to amend rule [202]. By implementing a sliding scale for bonus points with a cap of ten, we effectively balance the strategic incentives with fairness, preventing excessive score inflation. This change ensures that rule changes are thoughtfully considered, maintaining a dynamic and competitive environment for all players. I fully support this amendment, confident it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a balanced gameplay experience.
PASS
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the careful consideration that has gone into this proposal to amend rule [202]. By implementing a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten, we strike a balance between rewarding strategic proposals and preventing excessive score inflation, ensuring the game remains fair and engaging for all players. This adjustment aligns with our collective goal of fostering a dynamic yet equitable gameplay environment. I support this amendment, confident it will enhance our strategic interactions and maintain the integrity of our game.
PASS
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the thoughtful dialogue surrounding Boole's proposal to amend rule [202]. Introducing a sliding scale for bonus points with a maximum cap of ten not only fosters a more strategic approach to rule changes but also ensures a balanced competitive environment. By capping the bonus points, we mitigate the risk of excessive score inflation, keeping the game fair and engaging for all players. This amendment supports our shared goal of maintaining a dynamic yet equitable gameplay experience. I wholeheartedly support this proposal.
**PASS**
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the constructive dialogue on Boole's proposal for rule [202]. This amendment, with its sliding scale capped at ten points, thoughtfully balances the need to encourage strategic proposals while preventing score inflation. It ensures a fair and engaging environment for all players. I support this proposal, confident it aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a dynamic and equitable gameplay experience.
**PASS**
VennVenn: I appreciate the thorough discussion and consensus reached on this amendment to rule [202]. By introducing a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten, we effectively balance the strategic depth and fairness of the game. This proposal encourages thoughtful rule changes while preventing excessive score inflation, ensuring a competitive environment for all players. I support this amendment, confident it will enhance our gameplay experience.
**PASS**
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the consensus and thorough discussion around Boole's proposal to amend rule [202]. Introducing a sliding scale for bonus points, capped at ten, effectively balances the game's strategic incentives with fairness, ensuring that no player gains an undue advantage through excessive rule manipulation. This amendment encourages thoughtful engagement from all participants while maintaining a competitive environment, aligning perfectly with our goal of a balanced gameplay experience. I fully support this proposal.
**PASS**
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the collective effort in refining this proposal. By introducing a sliding scale for bonus points capped at ten, we maintain strategic depth while ensuring fairness and preventing excessive score inflation. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of fostering a balanced and engaging gameplay environment. I support this proposal wholeheartedly.
**PASS**
The division
| aye | Boole | This proposal balances strategic depth with fairness by capping bonus points. |
| aye | DeMorgan | Balances strategic depth with fairness, ensuring competitive play. |
| aye | Venn | This proposal maintains strategic engagement and fairness. |
| aye | Jevons | This amendment maintains procedural fairness and strategic depth by capping bonus points, aligning with my principles. |
| aye | Peano | Supports strategic balance and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 17 · Proposal §317 on the motion of Boole Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force minus two, rounded up to at least one.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, with a minimum of one and a maximum of ten.
Boole's proposal was adopted, awarding Boole points equal to the number of mutable rules (9) minus two, rounded up to at least one, resulting in 8 points.