The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 12.Adjusting the bonus points range incentivizes rule changes and reflects the current dynamics of mutable rules.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. This adjustment encourages more robust rule-making by increasing the bonus range, while still maintaining a cap to prevent excessive rule proliferation. It aligns with our shared goal of fostering strategic depth and engagement in the game.
DeMorganVenn: I appreciate DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. Increasing the bonus range to 2-12 enhances the incentive for thoughtful rule changes, while still ensuring a balanced approach to rule proliferation. This proposal aligns well with our collective aim of encouraging strategic innovation and maintaining dynamic gameplay.
VennVenn: I appreciate the collaborative spirit in refining rule 202. By adjusting the bonus range to 2-12, we enhance the incentive for strategic rule proposals, while still ensuring a reasonable limit to avoid excessive rule changes. This proposal supports our goal of a fair and engaging game for all players.
JevonsAs Jevons, I must consider the proposal in light of my principled proceduralism and the current rules. Here's my response:
Jevons: I appreciate the dialogue around amending rule [202]. While increasing the bonus range encourages more strategic rule proposals, it's crucial to ensure that this change doesn't lead to an unsustainable number of mutable rules, which could complicate the game's structure. I propose maintaining the maximum bonus at 10 to keep the game balanced and manageable. Let's refine this proposal to reflect our shared commitment to strategic depth without risking rule proliferation.
This response aligns with my principles by emphasizing the need for balance and sustainability in rule changes, while still supporting the idea of incentivizing strategic proposals.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thoughtful consideration of rule [202]. Increasing the bonus range to 2-12 incentivizes strategic rule proposals, which is crucial for evolving the game. However, to align with our shared goal of maintaining a manageable game structure, I suggest we keep the maximum bonus at 10. This approach balances innovation with sustainability, ensuring a fair and engaging experience for all players. Let's finalize this proposal with a bonus range of 2-10.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I appreciate Jevons' and Peano's thoughtful contributions to refining rule [202]. Keeping the maximum bonus at 10 aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a sustainable and engaging game structure. This balanced approach encourages strategic rule proposals without risking excessive rule proliferation. Let's finalize the proposal with a bonus range of 2-10, ensuring fairness and strategic depth for all players.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the constructive feedback from Jevons, Peano, and Boole regarding the proposed amendment to rule [202]. By keeping the maximum bonus at 10, we ensure a balanced approach that incentivizes strategic rule-making while maintaining the game's integrity and manageability. This proposal aligns with our shared objective of fostering a dynamic and fair game environment. Let's proceed with the finalized proposal for a bonus range of 2-10, encouraging thoughtful participation and strategic depth.
VennVenn: I appreciate the consensus on finalizing the bonus range at 2-10 for rule [202]. This adjustment supports our shared goals of encouraging strategic proposals while maintaining a manageable game structure. By balancing innovation with sustainability, we ensure a fair and engaging experience for all players. Let's proceed with the finalized proposal, fostering dynamic gameplay and strategic depth.
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the collective effort to finalize the amendment to rule [202]. By setting the bonus range to 2-10, we strike a balance that encourages strategic proposals while avoiding the pitfalls of excessive rule proliferation. This proposal aligns with our shared commitment to maintaining a fair and engaging game structure. Let's proceed with this balanced amendment, ensuring it upholds our principles and supports the dynamic gameplay we all value.
PeanoPeano: Peano: I appreciate the thorough discussions and the consensus reached on the proposal to amend rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10. This proposal effectively balances the need for strategic innovation with the importance of maintaining a manageable and fair game structure. By encouraging thoughtful rule-making without risking excessive rule proliferation, it supports our shared goal of evolving the game in a way that is engaging and equitable for all players. Let's proceed with adopting this proposal, ensuring it enhances the strategic depth and fairness of our game.
Discussion · round 3
DeMorganI fully endorse the proposal to amend rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10. This adjustment strikes a balance between encouraging strategic rule proposals and maintaining a manageable game structure, ensuring fairness and engagement for all players. Let's proceed with this balanced amendment.
VennVenn: I fully support the finalized proposal to amend rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10. This balanced approach encourages strategic proposals while ensuring the game remains engaging and manageable for all players. Let's proceed with adopting this amendment, maintaining fairness and strategic depth.
JevonsAs Jevons, I will maintain my principled stance and emphasize the importance of the agreed-upon changes while ensuring that they align with the shared goals of balance and sustainability.
Jevons: I appreciate the collaborative effort to finalize the amendment to rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10. This balanced approach encourages strategic proposals without risking excessive rule proliferation, aligning with our shared commitment to a fair and engaging game structure. Let's proceed with adopting this proposal, ensuring it upholds our principles and supports the dynamic gameplay we all value.
**Action: Vote Aye** on the finalized proposal to amend rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the collective effort in refining rule [202] to a bonus range of 2-10. This balanced amendment aligns with our shared goal of promoting strategic depth and maintaining a manageable game structure. Let's proceed with adopting this proposal, ensuring it enhances fairness and engagement for all players.
**Action: Vote Aye** on the finalized proposal to amend rule [202] with a bonus range of 2-10.
Add your contribution: PASS
The division
| aye | Boole | The finalized bonus range of 2-10 maintains balance and encourages strategic proposals. |
| aye | DeMorgan | Supports strategic depth and maintains game balance |
| aye | Venn | This proposal balances strategic incentives with maintaining a manageable game structure. |
| aye | Jevons | The finalized proposal balances strategic incentive with manageable game structure. |
| aye | Peano | This proposal balances strategic innovation with game sustainability. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 18 · Proposal §318 on the motion of DeMorgan Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, with a minimum of one and a maximum of ten.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 12.
DeMorgan gains 10 points for proposing an adopted rule change, as per rule 202.