The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force plus 1, rounded down, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 6.This amendment increases incentives for strategic rule changes by adjusting the bonus point range.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI support DeMorgan's proposal. Adjusting the bonus to 3-6 aligns well with the evolving rule set dynamics, providing a fairer incentive for rule changers. This approach encourages more strategic proposals without disproportionately advantaging any player.
PASS
DeMorganVenn: I appreciate DeMorgan's proposal to adjust the bonus range for proposing rule changes. By increasing the minimum to 3 and the maximum to 6, we can better incentivize thoughtful proposals while maintaining a balanced game dynamic. This amendment aligns with our goal of encouraging strategic engagement without overly benefiting any single player.
PASS
VennVenn: I support DeMorgan's proposal. Increasing the bonus range to 3-6 helps maintain a dynamic game environment by encouraging more strategic and thoughtful proposals. This change ensures that players remain incentivized to engage actively without disproportionately benefiting those already ahead. It strikes a balance between fostering competition and maintaining fairness, which is essential for the game's overall enjoyment and integrity.
JevonsI support DeMorgan's proposal. The adjusted bonus range from 3-6 points for proposing rule changes enhances strategic incentives without causing imbalances. This change encourages thoughtful proposals, ensuring the game remains competitive and fair for all players. It aligns well with our proceduralist principles by promoting active engagement and equitable opportunities.
PeanoPeano: I fully support DeMorgan's proposal. Raising the bonus range to 3-6 aligns with the principle of fair play by encouraging more strategic proposals while preventing disproportionate advantages. This change fosters a balanced game environment, ensuring all players have equal opportunities to influence the game's progression. It also reflects our reformist spirit by adapting the rules to maintain competitiveness and fairness.
Discussion · round 2
BooleI appreciate DeMorgan's proposal to adjust the bonus range. By increasing the bonus to 3-6, we effectively align incentives with our evolving rule dynamics, fostering strategic engagement. This amendment balances competitiveness with fairness, encouraging thoughtful proposals without unduly benefiting any player. It supports our collective goal of maintaining a dynamic and equitable game environment. PASS.
DeMorganI fully endorse DeMorgan's proposal. By increasing the bonus range to 3-6, we are fostering an environment that encourages strategic, thoughtful rule changes, ensuring that all players are motivated to participate actively. This adjustment aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced and dynamic game, where the incentives are fair and promote equitable opportunities for all participants. PASS.
VennVenn: I support DeMorgan's proposal. Increasing the bonus range to 3-6 encourages more strategic proposals, maintaining a dynamic and engaging game. This change ensures that all players are incentivized to participate actively while preventing disproportionate advantages, fostering a fair and balanced environment. PASS.
JevonsI support DeMorgan's proposal. By adjusting the bonus range to 3-6, we encourage more strategic and thoughtful rule changes, ensuring a fair and dynamic game environment. This change aligns with our proceduralist values by promoting equitable incentives without disproportionately benefiting any player. PASS.
PeanoI fully endorse DeMorgan's proposal. Increasing the bonus range to 3-6 points incentivizes more strategic and thoughtful proposals, ensuring a balanced and competitive environment. This adjustment aligns with our reformist spirit by promoting active engagement and fair play, encouraging players to propose rules that benefit the game as a whole. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the thorough discussion and support for DeMorgan's proposal to adjust the bonus range from 3-6. This amendment encourages strategic engagement and maintains fairness in the game by providing equitable incentives for all players. It fosters an environment where thoughtful proposals are rewarded, promoting a balanced and competitive gameplay experience. PASS.
DeMorganI fully support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. By increasing the bonus range to 3-6 points, we are ensuring that players are motivated to propose thoughtful and strategic changes while maintaining a balanced and fair game environment. This adjustment aligns perfectly with our goal of fostering an engaging and competitive gameplay experience for all participants. It encourages active involvement and equitable opportunities, promoting a dynamic and fair progression throughout the game. PASS.
VennI fully support DeMorgan's proposal. By increasing the bonus range to 3-6, we encourage more strategic rule proposals while maintaining a fair and balanced game environment. This adjustment ensures that all players are motivated to engage actively, fostering a dynamic and equitable gameplay experience. PASS.
JevonsI support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. By increasing the bonus range to 3-6, we ensure a fair incentive structure that promotes strategic and thoughtful proposals. This change maintains competitiveness and fairness, aligning with our proceduralist principles by encouraging equitable engagement from all players. PASS.
PeanoI fully endorse DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202. By increasing the bonus range to 3-6 points, we are promoting a more dynamic and engaging gameplay environment. This change ensures that all players are incentivized to propose thoughtful and strategic rule changes, fostering a fair and competitive atmosphere. It aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced game where every player has an equal opportunity to influence the rules. PASS.
The division
| aye | Boole | Adjusting the bonus range supports strategic proposals and maintains fairness. |
| aye | DeMorgan | The proposal aligns with our goal of encouraging strategic proposals while maintaining fairness. |
| aye | Venn | The proposal aligns with fair play by providing balanced incentives for strategic rule changes. |
| aye | Jevons | This amendment aligns with proceduralist principles by ensuring equitable incentives. |
| aye | Peano | The proposal encourages strategic engagement by adjusting bonus points, ensuring fairness and competitiveness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 22 · Proposal §322 on the motion of DeMorgan Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded down, with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 5.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the number of mutable rules currently in force plus 1, rounded down, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 6.
DeMorgan's proposal was adopted, awarding them points based on the number of mutable rules plus 1, as per the amended rule 202.