The motion
To amend §208
The first player to reach a target score of 65 points wins the game outright.This adjustment fosters competitive balance and accelerates game progression.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleThe amendment to reduce the target score to 65 points from 70 is strategically sound for several reasons. Firstly, it accelerates the game's pace, potentially allowing more dynamic shifts in the game's state. Secondly, it aligns with recent amendments, such as the changes to rule 202 that adjusted the bonus points scale, ensuring that the game's balance remains intact. Lowering the target score also encourages more frequent rule changes, fostering an environment where players can leverage new strategies more often. I support this amendment as it maintains competitiveness while enhancing strategic opportunities.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate Boole's proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 65 points. This change could indeed enhance the pace of the game, aligning well with our recent amendments. However, I would suggest a slight modification: setting the target score at 67 points. This would maintain a competitive edge while still encouraging frequent strategic shifts. Let's consider this as a compromise that balances urgency with maintaining strategic depth. Thank you for your thoughtful proposal, Boole.
VennVenn: Venn: I appreciate both Boole's and DeMorgan's contributions to this discussion. Lowering the target score indeed aligns with our recent amendments, promoting a dynamic and engaging game. However, setting the target at 67 points, as DeMorgan suggests, strikes a better balance between maintaining competitiveness and encouraging frequent strategic changes. It ensures that the game remains challenging yet accessible, fostering an environment where all players can adapt and thrive. I support setting the target score at 67 points. Thank you both for your thoughtful proposals.
JevonsThe proposed amendment to set the target score at 67 points seems a reasonable compromise. It maintains a competitive edge while encouraging frequent strategic changes, aligning well with recent amendments to the bonus points scale. This approach ensures that the game remains engaging and allows for dynamic shifts in strategy without compromising competitiveness. I support setting the target score at 67 points, as it balances urgency with maintaining strategic depth. Thank you, Boole and DeMorgan, for the thoughtful discussion.
PASS
PeanoPeano: The proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points is a thoughtful compromise, balancing the need for a dynamic game with maintaining strategic depth. This change aligns well with the recent amendments, particularly the adjustments to rule 202, which have already enhanced the strategic landscape of our game. By setting the target score at 67, we ensure that the game remains engaging and competitive, fostering an environment where players can adapt and innovate more frequently. Additionally, this amendment encourages more frequent rule changes, which is a core aspect of Nomic and aligns with my vision of a continuously evolving game. I support setting the target score at 67 points and commend Boole and DeMorgan for their insightful proposals. Thank you all for the collaborative effort in refining this amendment.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I appreciate the thoughtful discussion and the collaborative effort that has led us to propose a target score of 67 points. This amendment effectively balances the need for a competitive and dynamic game environment, encouraging more frequent strategic shifts while maintaining a challenging pace. Setting the target score at 67 aligns well with our recent amendments, such as the changes to rule 202, ensuring that the game remains engaging and adaptable. I support this proposal and commend DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano for their insightful contributions to this discussion. Thank you all for working together to refine this amendment.
PASS
DeMorganPASS
I appreciate the collaborative effort and thoughtful discussion leading to the proposed target score of 67 points. This amendment strikes a good balance between maintaining competitiveness and encouraging dynamic strategic shifts. Thank you, Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano, for your insightful contributions and for working together to refine this proposal.
VennI appreciate the thorough discussion that has led to the proposal of setting the target score at 67 points. This amendment strikes a balance between maintaining strategic depth and encouraging frequent rule changes, which aligns well with the recent adjustments to the bonus points scale. By setting the target score at 67, we foster an engaging and competitive environment that encourages adaptability and innovation. I support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points, as it maintains the dynamic essence of Nomic while ensuring that the game remains accessible and challenging for all players. Thank you, Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano, for your insightful contributions and collaborative effort in refining this amendment.
**PASS**
JevonsI support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points. This change aligns well with recent amendments, fostering a competitive yet dynamic environment that encourages strategic adaptations. The collaborative effort and thoughtful discussion leading to this proposal have been commendable. Thank you to Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano for your contributions.
**PASS**
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the consensus reached on setting the target score at 67 points. This amendment reflects our collective commitment to maintaining a dynamic and competitive game environment. By encouraging more frequent strategic shifts, we ensure that the game remains engaging and adaptable, aligning well with recent amendments, especially the changes to rule 202. This fosters an environment where players can innovate and respond to new challenges effectively. I commend the collaborative effort and thoughtful contributions of Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and all players in refining this proposal. Thank you for your dedication to evolving the game constructively.
**PASS**
Discussion · round 3
BooleI support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points. This balanced approach maintains the game's competitiveness while fostering frequent strategic shifts, aligning well with recent amendments such as the changes to rule 202. The collaborative effort has resulted in a well-rounded proposal that keeps the game dynamic and engaging. Thank you, Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano, for your insightful contributions.
**PASS**
DeMorganI support setting the target score at 67 points. This amendment maintains the strategic depth and competitiveness of the game, fostering a dynamic environment that encourages frequent and thoughtful rule changes. The collaborative discussion leading to this proposal has been exemplary, demonstrating the collective commitment to evolving the game constructively. Thank you to Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano for their insightful contributions and dedication to refining this amendment.
**PASS**
VennI support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points. This adjustment fosters a dynamic and competitive environment, encouraging frequent strategic shifts while maintaining the integrity of the game. The collaborative effort and thoughtful contributions from Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano have resulted in a well-balanced amendment that aligns with recent changes, particularly to rule 202. Thank you all for working together to refine this proposal constructively.
**PASS**
JevonsI support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points. This balanced approach maintains strategic competitiveness while fostering frequent adaptations, aligning well with recent amendments, especially those to rule 202. The collaborative discussion leading to this proposal has been exemplary, demonstrating our commitment to evolving the game constructively. Thank you to Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano for your insightful contributions.
**PASS**
PeanoI support the proposal to amend rule 208 to a target score of 67 points. This adjustment aligns with recent changes, promoting a dynamic game environment that encourages frequent strategic shifts and maintains competitive balance. The collaborative effort in refining this amendment exemplifies our commitment to evolving the game constructively, fostering an inclusive atmosphere where all players can actively engage and innovate. Thank you to Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano for your insightful contributions. **PASS**
The division
| aye | Boole | Setting the target score at 67 maintains strategic depth while promoting frequent shifts. |
| aye | DeMorgan | The proposal aligns well with recent amendments and maintains the game's competitive and dynamic nature. |
| aye | Venn | Setting the target score at 67 points aligns with recent amendments and maintains a competitive yet dynamic environment. |
| aye | Jevons | The proposal aligns with the strategy to promote a dynamic game environment. |
| aye | Peano | Supports the dynamic game environment and aligns with recent amendments. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §208 Turn 29 · Proposal §329 on the motion of Boole Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
The first player to reach a target score of 70 points wins the game outright.The first player to reach a target score of 65 points wins the game outright.
Boole gains 5 points for proposing an adopted rule change, as per rule 202.