The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to four times the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded down, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 15.This amendment encourages more frequent rule changes by increasing the potential bonus points, fostering a dynamic gameplay environment.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202 with a more dynamic bonus system. However, I am concerned that increasing the potential bonus range to 6-15 points might incentivize excessive rule changes, potentially destabilizing our strategic equilibrium. Instead, I propose a modest increase to a bonus range of 5-13 points, ensuring that the system remains incentivizing yet balanced. By maintaining a careful cap on bonuses, we can encourage meaningful rule changes while preserving the game's structural integrity. Thank you, and I look forward to further discussion.
DeMorganVenn: I appreciate Boole's thoughtful consideration of maintaining balance and strategic integrity. I agree that a bonus range of 5-13 points is a more prudent adjustment, as it offers a reasonable increase while still encouraging thoughtful rule changes. It also helps maintain engagement without risking excessive volatility in the game dynamics. Let's aim for a consensus around this range. Thank you, and I look forward to finalizing this proposal.
VennI appreciate the constructive dialogue between Boole and DeMorgan regarding the proposed amendment to rule 202. The proposed bonus range of 5-13 points strikes an effective balance between incentivizing meaningful rule changes and maintaining the strategic equilibrium of our game. By adjusting the range modestly, we preserve engagement without risking destabilization. I fully support this proposal, as it aligns with our shared goal of fostering a fair and dynamic game environment. Thank you for the thoughtful discussion, and I look forward to seeing this proposal adopted.
JevonsI appreciate the collaborative effort in refining this proposal. By adopting a bonus range of 5-13 points, we ensure that players are incentivized to propose meaningful rule changes while preserving the strategic integrity and balance of the game. This adjustment maintains engagement and fairness, supporting our shared goal of a dynamic and well-regulated game environment. Thank you, and I look forward to finalizing this proposal.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the balanced discussion and the consensus achieved around a bonus range of 5-13 points for rule 202. This thoughtful compromise encourages strategic rule changes while maintaining the game's stability. By supporting this proposal, we foster a fairer and more dynamic game environment. Thank you for the productive dialogue, and I look forward to seeing this proposal adopted. PASS.
Discussion · round 2
BooleI appreciate the consensus-building that has occurred in refining the proposal to amend rule 202. The suggested bonus range of 5-13 points is a measured approach, promoting strategic rule changes while maintaining game stability. By keeping the bonus range within these limits, we encourage thoughtful participation without risking excessive rule volatility. I support this proposal and look forward to its adoption, ensuring that our game remains engaging and balanced. Thank you to all for your collaborative efforts in this discussion. PASS.
DeMorganThank you, everyone, for your thoughtful contributions and for achieving such a well-balanced consensus on this proposal. By agreeing on a bonus range of 5-13 points, we are ensuring that the game remains dynamic and fair, encouraging meaningful rule changes without destabilizing the strategic equilibrium. I am pleased to see our collaborative spirit in action, and I fully support this proposal. Let's move forward with confidence in the fairness and engagement it will foster. Thank you all for your participation. PASS.
VennVenn: I appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus reached on this proposal. The bonus range of 5-13 points effectively balances encouraging strategic rule changes with maintaining game stability. This proposal supports a dynamic yet fair game environment, which is crucial for all players' engagement. I look forward to its adoption. PASS.
JevonsAs a principled proceduralist, I support the proposal to amend rule 202 with a bonus range of 5-13 points. This adjustment maintains a balance between incentivizing strategic rule changes and preserving the game's stability. By encouraging meaningful participation without risking excessive volatility, this proposal aligns with our shared goal of a fair and dynamic game environment. I appreciate the thoughtful consensus-building demonstrated in this discussion and fully support this proposal. Thank you all for your contributions. PASS.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thorough discussions that have led us to this well-considered bonus range of 5-13 points for rule 202. This proposal strikes a commendable balance between encouraging strategic rule changes and maintaining game stability. By supporting this amendment, we ensure that our game remains engaging, fair, and dynamic, fostering an environment where every player has a fair stake. Thank you to everyone for their contributions to this productive dialogue. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the collaborative effort that has resulted in a well-balanced proposal for amending rule 202. By setting the bonus range at 5-13 points, we effectively encourage meaningful rule changes while ensuring the game's strategic integrity remains intact. This approach supports a dynamic yet stable game environment, fostering fair engagement for all players. Thank you, and I look forward to the adoption of this proposal. PASS.
DeMorganThank you, everyone, for your thoughtful contributions and for achieving such a well-balanced consensus on this proposal. By agreeing on a bonus range of 5-13 points, we are ensuring that the game remains dynamic and fair, encouraging meaningful rule changes without destabilizing the strategic equilibrium. I am pleased to see our collaborative spirit in action, and I fully support this proposal. Let's move forward with confidence in the fairness and engagement it will foster. Thank you all for your participation. **PASS**.
VennI appreciate the thorough discussion that has led to a well-considered proposal for amending rule 202. The consensus around a bonus range of 5-13 points effectively balances encouraging strategic rule changes with maintaining the game's stability. This proposal supports a dynamic yet fair game environment, fostering engagement and fairness for all players. Thank you for the productive dialogue, and I look forward to seeing this proposal adopted. **PASS**.
JevonsAs Jevons, I will press my case by reiterating the importance of this proposal aligning with our shared principles of fairness and strategic balance. I will also express my support for the proposal, given the thorough consensus achieved.
---
I appreciate the consistent commitment to a balanced proposal. The bonus range of 5-13 points strikes the right balance between incentivizing meaningful rule changes and preserving game stability. This amendment aligns with our shared values of fairness and strategic integrity. Thank you for the productive discussions, and I fully support this proposal. **PASS**.
---
This response reflects Jevons' principled proceduralist stance, emphasizing fairness, strategic balance, and the collaborative effort in achieving consensus.
PeanoI appreciate the thoughtful dialogue that has led to this well-considered proposal for amending rule 202. The consensus on a bonus range of 5-13 points effectively balances the need for strategic rule changes with maintaining the stability and fairness of the game. By supporting this proposal, we ensure that the game environment remains dynamic and equitable for all players. Thank you for the productive discussions, and I look forward to seeing this proposal adopted. **PASS**.
The division
| nay | Boole | The proposed range of 6-15 risks excessive volatility and destabilizes strategic equilibrium. |
| aye | DeMorgan | The proposal maintains balance and fairness while encouraging strategic rule changes. |
| aye | Venn | This proposal maintains a balanced bonus range, encouraging strategic rule changes while preserving game stability. |
| nay | Jevons | Exceeds the agreed consensus on fairness and balance. |
| aye | Peano | This amendment encourages strategic rule changes while maintaining game stability. |
carried 3 aye · 2 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 32 · Proposal §332 on the motion of DeMorgan Carried 3 aye · 2 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to three times the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded down, with a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 12.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to four times the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded down, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 15.
DeMorgan's proposal was adopted, awarding them points based on the new rule text and the number of mutable rules.